← все видео

The Secret to Getting Better Deals Without Pushing with Hostage Negotiator Chris Voss

UNEMPLOYABLE with Jeff Dudan · 2026-03-09 · 56м 55с · 80 просмотров · YouTube ↗

Топики: launch-sales-discovery

Аудио ещё не скачано.

📝 Summary

model=openai/gpt-oss-120b · prompt=summary-v7 · 13 121→2 293 tokens · 2026-05-28 08:00:25

🎯 Главная суть

Техники тактической эмпатии, разработанные в ФБР для переговоров с заложниками, позволяют получать больше информации, ускорять процесс принятия решений и добиваться лучших результатов в бизнес‑переговорах без давления и конфликтов.

Детство и семейные ценности

Крис Восс вырос в небольшом городе в Айове в семье предпринимателя‑посредника в нефтяном бизнесе. Отец требовал самостоятельного решения задач: давал список дел и лишь базовые инструменты, а дальше ребёнок сам находил пути их выполнения. Такая «figure‑it‑out» культура сформировала у Восса стойкую трудовую этику, умение быстро учиться и готовность брать на себя ответственность за результат.

Путь в правоохранительные органы

После неудачной попытки поступить в Университет Северной Айовы Восс несколько лет работал в местной полиции, где прошёл отбор в команду SWAT, но из‑за строгих правил службы не смог официально вступить в неё. Одновременно подал заявку в ФБР; его приняли за две недели до того, как он стал бы допущен к SWAT. Это совпадение открыло ему путь к работе в подразделении по переговорам с заложниками.

Как возник интерес к переговорам

Первоначально Восс наслаждался физической стороной службы в SWAT: стрельба, спускание с верёвок, рейды. После травмы колена и повторных операций он понял, что физические нагрузки ограничены, а переговоры — более устойчивый карьерный путь. Переговорщики всегда находятся в поле действия, а их работа требует принятия быстрых решений, что привлекло Восса к этой роли.

Обучение и первые реальные операции

В течение полутора лет Восс проходил интенсивную подготовку, пока не получил первое реальное задание — банковскую кражу в Бруклине. В свободное время он практиковал навыки на горячей линии для суицидальных звонков, где смог за 20 минут успокоить людей, в то время как обычные беседы занимали часы. Этот опыт продемонстрировал, насколько быстро тактическая эмпатия меняет поведение собеседника.

Тактическая эмпатия как ядро переговоров

Эмпатия в переговорах у Восса — не просто сочувствие, а активное распознавание и отражение эмоций собеседника. Он сравнивает её с «музыкой между нотами»: в паузах и небольших реакциях создаётся пространство для раскрытия информации. Пример: на горячей линии он отмечал, что человек «выглядит тревожным», что заставляло звонящего осознать своё состояние и успокоиться.

Техника «лейблинг», «мирроринг» и «динамическое молчание»

Пример из реального полёта: обмен местами в самолёте

Восс хотел поменять место с девушкой, сидящей рядом. Он начал с широкой улыбки, затем сказал: «У меня плохое предложение», создав интригу. После короткой паузы он уточнил цель, и собеседник сразу встал, чтобы поменяться, не задумываясь о конфликте. Этот случай иллюстрирует, как правильный тон и пауза могут превратить потенциальный конфликт в быстрый согласованный результат.

Ошибка «фиксация на сделке» и как её избежать

Многие переговорщики заранее формируют желаемый результат и «якорятся» на конкретной цифре, что приводит к потере гибкости и оставлению денег на столе. Восс советует сначала собрать информацию, дать собеседнику высказаться, а уже затем формировать предложение. Это снижает риск «потери сделки» и позволяет выявить скрытые потребности, которые часто оказываются более ценными, чем первоначальная цель.

Принцип «не фокусироваться на общей почве»

Традиционный совет искать общие интересы (common ground) может мешать эмпатии, потому что создаёт иллюзию согласия, не раскрывая истинных проблем. Вместо этого Восс предлагает задавать вопросы, которые заставляют собеседника раскрыть свои реальные ограничения (например, развод, семейные проблемы), тем самым позволяя решить коренную причину конфликта.

Применение тактики в бизнес‑консультациях Black Swan Group

Компания Black Swan Group работает там, где стороны «застряли» и не могут найти решение. Их задачи включают: коучинг по самостоятельному урегулированию страховых претензий, помощь в семейных и деловых спорах, подготовку к медиации с адвокатами. При этом они избегают вмешательства в разводы, поскольку их роль может конфликтовать с интересами юристов, получающих оплату за длительные процессы.

Пример с высоким «якорем» и его последствия

Восс критикует популярную бизнес‑практику «high anchoring» (заявление экстремально высокой цены). По его опыту такие предложения часто отталкивают партнёров, особенно в реальных, многократных отношениях. Он приводит пример из книги Неда Коллетти о том, как агент предложил нереально высокий гонорар, после чего клиент просто отказался. В реальном мире лучше позволить другой стороне первой озвучить цифру, чтобы собрать информацию о её ожиданиях.

Как управлять эмоциями собеседника через «само‑осведомлённость»

Прямое отрицание эмоций («не волнуйтесь») усиливает сопротивление. Вместо этого Восс использует метки типа «вы кажетесь тревожным», что заставляет человека осознать своё состояние и одновременно снижает его интенсивность. Нейронаучные исследования подтверждают, что такое «название» эмоций активирует области мозга, отвечающие за их регуляцию, уменьшая их негативное воздействие.

Психология «убийственного пути» в заложнических переговорах

Если человек уже настроен на «убийственный путь» (например, готов покончить с собой), лучший шанс — прекратить коммуникацию, потому что дальнейшее общение уже включено в его план. Восс советует определить, является ли процесс переговоров частью их конечной цели; если нет, то лучше «заморозить» разговор и дать им возможность завершить свой путь без вмешательства.

Как «deal fixation» приводит к потере выгоды

Когда переговорщик уже знает, какой результат хочет, он часто игнорирует новые данные, которые могут улучшить сделку. Восс отмечает, что такие люди часто «закрепляются» на своей позиции, не задают вопросов и не используют техники раскрытия информации, из‑за чего оставляют деньги на столе. Он рекомендует регулярно проверять свои предположения и открыто спрашивать о скрытых мотивах.

Обучение и масштабирование через Fireside и групповой коучинг

Fireside — приложение, превращающее подкаст в интерактивный формат группового коучинга. Участники собираются онлайн раз в неделю, обсуждают актуальные темы, а затем проходят сессию вопросов‑ответов. Такой формат позволяет получать живую обратную связь, а не только статический материал из книг, и привлекает предпринимателей со всего мира, включая участников из Тибета.

Пример из международных операций: заложник в Саудовской Аравии

Во время операции по спасению американского заложника Пола Джонсона Восс настоял на присутствии саудовского специалиста, несмотря на скептицизм посла. После того как план был представлен, саудовцы быстро согласились, а операция завершилась успешным тактическим ударом, в результате чего заложник был убит, но его убийцы были нейтрализованы. Этот случай показал, как правильное позиционирование и демонстрация компетентности могут изменить ход дипломатических переговоров.

Будущее Black Swan Group и новые направления

Компания планирует расширять обучение в Дубае, запускать реалити‑шоу без сценария и продолжать выпуск книг, уже продающихся в более чем 30 странах. Кроме того, они развивают онлайн‑программы, позволяющие предпринимателям применять тактическую эмпатию в реальном времени, а также продолжают исследовать психологию переговоров через практику и академические исследования.

Ключевая мысль, меняющая подход к переговорам

Самый простой, но мощный совет Восса: «Потратьте время, чтобы человек почувствовал, что его действительно понимают». Это создает доверие, снижает оборону и открывает путь к совместному решению, будь то спасение заложника, урегулирование семейного спора или заключение крупной бизнес‑сделки.

📜 Transcript

en · 10 014 слов · 707 сегментов · flagged: word_run (1 dropped, q=1.00)

Показать текст транскрипта
The FBI came and I got hired two weeks before I would have been eligible to go to the SWAT team. It's one of the few Harvard studies that I ever agreed with. It said that if you solve the problem yourself, somebody else struggling with the same problem, you'll either more likely to look at them and go like, look, I solved this. Pick yourself up off the ground. You know, stop being a crybaby and fix it because I fixed it. So I'm going to get a lot more information. You're going to feel good about giving it to me. It's going to accelerate us towards the outcome. you know, hence why back on the suicide hotline, I can get to where I want to go in 20 minutes when other people are taking four or five, six hours in regular conversations. Hey, everybody, welcome back to the Unemployable Podcast. I'm Jeff Duden. If you grew up in Iowa, took a shot and joined the FBI, ultimately serving 24 years in the FBI Crisis Negotiation Unit, rising to the FBI's top chief international hostage and kidnapping negotiator, and today have translated those skills to critical business negotiation, selling or closing big deals, and are the author of the best-selling book, Never Split the Difference. Your name can only be the sometimes frightening Chris Voss. Welcome. Thanks, Jeff. Happy to be on. Thanks for having me on. Yeah, man. That's great. Chris, would you mind sharing a little bit about your backstory? I knew you grew up in Iowa, a little bit of early life, and then kind of how that translated into your career? Yeah, small town, Iowa, blue collar, Midwest, work ethic. My father was an entrepreneur, you know, had his own business, sold proprietorship. And we all worked for my dad. I mean, as soon as you had responsibilities, you went to work probably as soon as you could start carrying stuff around, you know. And I think it was my father felt like you had to earn your share and you had to figure stuff out. It was very much a figure it out, pitch in life that I grew up in. And my dad had given me a list of stuff to do and maybe give me a couple of the tools that I needed to do it, and then I had to go figure out how to do it. That was kind of how I grew up. Yeah, so he was in the oil and gas business and gas stations and stuff like that? Yeah, yeah, he was an oil jobber, sort of the middleman. He got the product from Shell Oil and then distributed it to gas stations or small companies, large farms. Home heating oil was a big part of the business. When he bought it, it disappeared almost completely entirely and he had to adapt. And so went from supplying gas stations with product to owning them and owning convenience stores. Went into the convenience store business with my mother. Yeah, so you had credited, I know I've wrote a book or two, and when you think about the foreword of it and who you dedicate it to, you dedicated it to your parents and you called out hard work and integrity inside of that. So is that, you know, how did that translate towards, you know, your career and really pushing you forward? You went to Iowa State, correct? Yeah, yeah. Mostly because for two reasons. You know, my older sister went there and, you know, she was really looked up to her and sort of followed her. And then it was far enough away from home that I was separated away from home, but also not so far that, you know, I couldn't get home on a weekend if I had to. And I did occasionally, you know, my father needed me to come back. But, yeah, I was state cyclone. Yeah. I spent a decade in Iowa, one year. I went to the university. No, so I went to the University of Northern Iowa in Cedar Falls for a year, and it was great. Didn't make it. I didn't make the grades. I lacked a little bit of the hard work and discipline at that point in time. But, man, went home with a buddy one weekend and shot a gun for the first time. Took my first shot out of a Dixie cup that day. I may have – I think I witnessed insurance fraud with a ball-peen hammer and a Cadillac after a hailstorm and then partied in a ditch in a cornfield. And that was all on a Saturday. So that was the first day. That was the first day. I think we went cruising, too. But, no, but it was great. Still have friends there, and I'm a Midwestern guy, Chicago guy as well, so I appreciate that very much. As you moved forward in your career, you went to the police department first, and then you had a time where you had a choice to go to the FBI or, I think, to the SWAT team. Right. How did you make that decision? Yeah, well, just stupid, stupidity, really. I had interviewed for the SWAT team before I was technically eligible on a police department. And I just, you know, I just was going through the selection process mostly to learn it, you know, to prepare for when I might actually get on the team. And for whatever reason, you know, they picked me number one. But I didn't have enough time on the job at that point in time. And the lieutenant colonel in charge of administration, you know, the sergeants and the captains on SWAT figured that they could get him to, you know, loosen up. And he was like, nah, this is a rule. We're sticking to it. So I'm sitting there number one on the list for the SWAT team and people under the list are going being taken person after person after person. Even to the point where the speculation was if they took everybody on the list and I still wasn't eligible, they were going to start over. So at about the same time, I got interested in federal law enforcement, ended up putting my application in for the FBI. And I remember sitting there literally thinking and saying, you know, whoever comes to me first, you know, that's where I'm going. But it's the SWAT team or the FBI. And so I was just too stupid to really make a great decision at that point in time. I'm grateful that the FBI came and I got hired two weeks before I would have been eligible to go to the SWAT team. Just two weeks. And it's not that often you get to see the fork in the road that clearly. And I'm really happy with the way that it worked out. The Bureau hired me and I went to Quantico. How early in your career did you know that you wanted to be in negotiation? Yeah, no, that was totally out of left field. I was on the SWAT team, FBI Pittsburgh, and enjoyed SWAT a lot. It was great. I mean, being on a SWAT team is a lot of fun. It's close to being a professional athlete, and you get to shoot guns. And you get to blow stuff up, and you get to rappel down the side of buildings, and you get to do all kinds of stupid, crazy, adrenaline things. And it's a lot of fun. The training aspect of it is, operations aspect of it. You know, I went on two operations while I was on the team. You know, you lay in the mud. and uh and somebody shows up with a bullhorn and tells people inside to come out which is actually what happened we raided a motorcycle gang clubhouse and in order to you know you lock people up first thing in the morning they tend to be the most docile then it's the very best time to get somebody while they're still waking up so you know we went out to this motorcycle gang clubhouse out in the woods we went out about 11 o'clock the night before and some distance away and trekked through the woods you know went through the the power line routes and surrounded a place early in the morning and laid out there on the ground until the sun came up and the negotiators came in and called them out. But then I tried out for the FBI's hostage rescue team, the tier one counter-terrorist SWAT team based out of Quantico, and re-injured my knee and then thought, went in for my second reconstructive knee surgery and figured that that couldn't happen too many more times. So I thought we had hostage negotiators. They're always there. I like crisis response because I like decision makings. I think, you know, comfortable inaction defeats people more than making mistakes does. You know, it's a paraphrase of the Kennedy quote from way back when. So I figured negotiators, you know, how hard could it be? I talk to people all the time. And I was a bit of a securitist root for that. I was initially rejected, did what I needed to do to get on. And when I got trained, it was phenomenal. It was as satisfying as SWAT was, hostage negotiation was much more for me. I enjoyed it more than anything else I ever did. One thing that landed with me in the book was the time between live situations. I think you were training for a year and a half before you got your first action. And it was a bank situation. What do you do in the downtime? time, uh, is, was that the time I like to say the music's made between the notes, right? So you have this time you're, you're, you're looking at how the FBI does things. You're, you're, you're now you're, you're putting that into live situation and then you're iterating on it. You're figuring out what works and what doesn't work. And you really, you really led, uh, some powerful thinking inside of the, um, you know, how negotiation evolved. um you know what what kinds of things did you do you know between the live activities and then after you had a live situation how did you break that down and learn from it well everything i designed my life at that point in time so that everything kind of interacted you know it was all um interlocked if you will hostage negotiations just high intensity interviewing and not interrogation there's a big difference between interviewing and interrogation interrogation is kind of stupid if you ask me like when i saw the movie oh dark 30 when they were hunting ben laden and they were interrogating to try to catch him i remember thinking no wonder it took so long these guys are horrible this interrogation is just stupid i mean i really thought that and i believe that to this day anyway um so i volunteered on the suicide hotline and it was before the term emotional intelligence had been coined or we really knew what you know empathy in its purest form was and i was just uh astonished at the instantaneous impact it had on people's behavior like on the hotline it was 20 minutes or less with somebody who was completely suicidal and i remember they told us that in advance i thought you know that can't be it's you know there's no way you know you people are famous you talk to somebody who's distraught overnight you know there's always all these stories hours 20 minutes you got to be kidding me but when i saw how powerful and how quickly it changed people's behavior i thought you know what if this worked in everyday life it sounds like the regular interviews that the guys that i admire do regularly and so between uh learning hostage negotiation toying with it in my personal and professional life everything's sort of in a lot and i was constantly learning about it fascinated by it the ability to impact somebody the ability to catch somebody and read their emotions and literally have them say you're reading my mind and i remember thinking like no well i read your emotions they're all over your face and your actions and your voice and you think i'm reading your mind so by the the time I finally got, you know, with the bad guy, the bank robber of Brooklyn, about a year and a half, two years later, I'd been practicing like crazy because I was fascinated by it. I looked through the toolkit in the book. Is tactical empathy really the center, really the core of it? And I say that, so I've built multiple franchise companies over the years And empathy was something like we, I talk about it in training because for us, uh, the way, the way I talk about it is, uh, we use it in, inside of like our servant leadership, uh, that value that we have. And, you know, you need to, you need to give people what they truly need, not what they say they want in the moment. So to do that, you've got to be in the pocket with people like a boxing term, like you've got to be close enough to them so that they trust you. They believe you understand what they're going against, even though in franchising, we've done it like 500 times now, and it's the same pattern of conversation back because what we're truly trying to do is make sure that we're working on the right problem. So, for example, somebody might say, well, you know, it's my market or it's the marketing or my staff. That's the problem with the business or competition or anything like that. But in the face of great validation, um, they're really holding themselves hostage and, you know, it, and then you, you might dig behind and, and it might be like, well, I'm going through a divorce. So the real problem is their eye is off the ball because they're going through a divorce. It's not any of these other things that they kind of threw out as, as little landmines to, to, to not answer your question. So, you know, the way I look at it is, you know, people are arguing with themselves for their self limitations, you know, things they're uncomfortable with. I don't like to do sales. I don't like to do this. I don't like to do this other thing. So it's up to us to get close enough to them to really make them internalize and accept responsibility for the problem that they're really having. So I, you know, and I know you do a lot of business consulting and I don't know if any of that resonates with the things that you come across in corporate America and you're coaching today yeah it all does and it's very layered and you know grappling with it for you personally i mean everybody they begin to understand it pretty much based on um their experiences up up to that point on being understood or genuinely understanding someone and those instances tend to be so rare in everyday life that we don't have a lot of models around us um and the vast majority of models are really bad you know the movies and tv are horrible i mean just absolutely horrible and one of the first commandments of negotiation that we're teaching now is thou shalt not focus on common ground everybody the movies teach us a common ground is is uh the key to everything and a point of fact um it actually interferes with your ability to be empathic because if you share common ground with somebody and they're struggling with what you perceive to to be the problem is one of the few Harvard studies that I ever agreed with. It said that if you solve the problem yourself, somebody else struggling with the same problem, you'll either more likely to look at them and go like, look, I solved this, pick yourself up off the ground, you know, stop being a cry baby and fix it because I fixed it. Or if you were defeated by that problem, your likely reaction is like, oh man, you're in trouble. I mean, yeah, that's insurmountable. I mean, I came up against that and I couldn't solve it. Neither one of those are empathy, but the feeling of being genuinely understood, if you're lucky, it's happened to you a couple of times and you remember that moment and it's transformative. And if you can't recall in a moment what was said, you might not have any idea what happened or how to duplicate it or how to do it again. So to one of your original points, servant leadership, you're kind of getting out of your own way to really genuinely make the other person feel understood to serve them you lose your agenda about moving forward and in that mind frame you're much more likely to be there for them to nurture them to coach them to give them the coaching and the support that they need in that moment to sort of come to grips with whatever they're struggling with internally look i just did it i just tripped on myself i said i've seen it 500 times before but to this person that's a unique situation And yeah, that's, you know, that's how hard it is to stay is to stay in there with these people. We're training our coaches. We're doing the best we can. I I've worked with a guy called Michael Reddington. He wrote a book called the discipline listening method, and he was a, uh, loss prevention, a guy who would get confessions, you know, six, uh, what Wicklander Zalusky Wicklander out of Chicago. And they would 76% confession rate when they would find, you know, corporate theft or whatever it was. And, you know, he would say, um, that, uh, let's see, he would say, encouraging people to share sensitive information under vulnerable circumstances in the face of consequences. And that a person will confess when they believe a reasonable person facing similar circumstances might have behaved the same way. So that's basically saying we have to get, you have to get to a point of understanding where they, those people feel like maybe even this person faced with these circumstances, this opportunity to take something, when is the first time you took something, you know, I meant to bring it back when things were better, I was going to pay it back, but they never did. They never got caught. So it created this pattern of, you know, justification of continuing to take, um, you know, uh, we, we, I enrolled all of my coaches into one of his classes because what I was trying to get at, and we haven't gotten there yet is how can we be empathic inside of these conversations and very quickly help these business owners do what they need to do in the best way possible. So, and I don't know if it's, it is that the core of what you do? What's a typical assignment for the Black Swan group when you go in? Um, well, wherever people need to communicate better to solve a problem that they're just really stuck on. Now that sounds really vague, but we end up, we, we train and we coach, we do a lot of coaching, much more than I ever thought we would. And for everything other than divorces, we don't get in the middle of divorces just because we're a threat to your attorney. Your divorce attorney does not get paid to resolve if he resolves a problem. You know, attorneys don't get paid to resolve problems. They get paid to bill. They get paid to run the bill. And if somebody comes in who's going to shorten the process, which tactical empathy always does, always, always, always, we're the enemy of that attorney's livelihood. Right. Exactly. Well, it's like big pharma. They don't really get paid to cure you. They just want to make sure you're healthy enough to continue to take the medicine. Yeah. Big pharma is a whole separate conversation. Yeah. But, yeah, so we coach people settling insurance claims on their own. We coach business partners. We coach one of our high-level coaching clients, and we've got a few people that are extremely high-level. He used the skills in the midst of the mediation through attorneys to the other side not that long ago, he knows he saved himself eight million dollars on the application of skills because they're invisible if you're doing it really well the other side just thinks you're in a conversation and then if you're not out to cut their throat uh if you're not out to cheat people then they have no reason ever to feel otherwise because you remove yourself as an enemy so it could be anything i'm i negotiated a change in seats on the airplane just the other day my girlfriend and i were separated uh on on the plane and like you hear these these uh you know would you swap with my husband or my wife or my girlfriend and i see about 50 success rate and but then the issue is not what your success rate is how does a person feel when it's done and that's that's a real critical issue. I don't want somebody to have swapped seats with my girlfriend to inconvenience us and have them be in a negative mood the entire airplane ride and get off the plane unhappy. Now, there's some kind of way that's going to come back on me. I'm a big believer in a karma bank and I got the karma bank working in my direction on a regular basis. But we coach in every kind of negotiation there is. Anytime you want collaboration from somebody, you're in negotiation a situation like that you just met somebody it's going to be a 30-second negotiation what are some keys for quickly developing rapport and then maybe disarming some disarming statements that you can make yeah well i'll tell you what i said to this guy big smile big smiles first typically a big smile makes a big difference yeah it's a little bit situational like you know the playful attitude being playful is a superpower it's not what you want to go with all the time and I did not go with playful with this guy you know the same set of circumstances somebody's you know they got their luggage in your leg room which happens on a regular basis being playful about it that then is critical because you got to sit next to this person all the time but actually what i said to this guy um and i'm in i'm in a i'm in a bulkhead we're both in bulkhead seats he's got bulkhead aisle i got bulkhead window which means you can't put the bags in the seat in front of you uh because you got to go overhead which is really inconvenient for some people so i wait for this this guy to finally show up he's one of the last people on on a plane in this section and i just look at him and i go i got a lousy proposition for it and i was not playful bullying and his his dude just yeah you're not gonna like this yeah yeah because i'm you know i i gotta i need what i want to be a relief and i don't i don't want him to give it to me and be angry and you know any of that stuff plus he's less likely to give it to me so he stares at me and this is um a moment that we call dynamic silence i no matter what i i cannot break this silence um so he stares at me and he goes i'm listening and i go my girlfriend is four rows back on a window would you swap seats and before i finish my next sentence he has grabbed his bags and is headed in her direction like i had three or four more things i wanted to say i want to be praying here you know i go i've almost been like hey hey i'm not done yet you know i still want to work on this but he is back and moving towards his seat before i have even finished so you know i don't i don't know what i i in hindsight i got a pretty good idea what probably went through his mind but um you know i got it quickly and there was one of the few times when being playful was not my approach i think i'm probably playful about a good 90 of the time and this one i wasn't people get in trouble when they let things go too fast that's my problem when i like i have deal fixation so uh if i was gonna be really self critical i would say i already know the deal that i want when i'm going into it so now i've got deal fixation i think it's a good deal for everybody which is probably a bad way to go into it so i'm not going to anchor somewhere i'm not going to anchor and then i'm not going to do the work to come up with like why we're anchoring there so now i'm already setting myself to leave something up leave something on the table, and then I can't wait to get it done. And if you're in a hostage situation or a really important negotiation, that's probably the wrong approach, I would say. So how do you coach people to slow themselves down? That's a hard one because, you know, what you talked about on deal fixation, that's what people do as human beings. Compromise. We want compromise. Or, you know, you get goal-focused, and that gives you tunnel vision. You get blinders on. And I'm listening to a big fan of the Andrew Huberman podcast. In a couple of podcasts back, you know, he's talking to a neuroscientist, and they say, this is how people think of things. And I call this DPO, duration, path, and outcome. You think about where you want to be. You think about how you're going to get there, and you think about how long it's going to take you to get there. duration path and outcome that has a tendency of just how we as human beings are wired we pick out a target we figure out how we're going to get there we figure out how long it's going to take and so that is one of the big challenges to teach people this stuff because you got to let go of the target to start with because intellectually i can explain to you why you don't have all the information and by and large as a human being you're not going to care like i know where this is going on it is what it is i think uh somebody wrote a book probably about 10 years ago the 10 commandments of negotiation which failed miserably and one of those guys commandments was is what it is no it's not there are all sorts of variables here that you don't know that the other side is intentionally holding back from you because they're important and you're intentionally holding stuff back from them because it's important so consequently it can't be it is what it is because they're keeping you in the dark no matter how smart you are and if you're the smartest person on earth you're keeping them in the dark which has this uh the opposite of synergy you know you're losing synergy by keeping each other in the dark so if you get deal focused which is hard not to be because you're wired to do that you're leaving money on the table every time yes i have found that the last thing people say at the end of a phone call is the first thing they wanted to say and they just been holding it a long time yeah and it's it's you know and i coach people that and i'm just like oh one more thing right that's actually the thing that they've been holding they never got to it but they had to spit it out before they hung up the phone And it kind of goes along with your, you know, your, your, uh, black Swan things, three things inside of a negotiation that would you have known them? They would have changed everything. Have you, have you developed techniques to make sure that when people are negotiating, they identify those things or they can at least prompt people to give them up? Um, yeah, well, there's, there's things that, you know, are important and things that, that are important. You just don't know. holding you in the dark. So the basics, we got nine negotiation skills, but we call the quick two plus one the essentials. Like if you can master labeling and mirroring and dynamic silence, you probably do extremely well all the time. Like your batting average will go way up. Now what those things are designed to do is to dig into what was said and get people to expand, to reward, to add on. Like the mirror, just repeating one to three words of what you just said, exactly. Just repeating those words, whether the last three words or whether a selected three words. It causes people to expand and go on. Now there's two advantages to this, and this is exactly what you were just talking about. You're probably gonna add stuff to it that you didn't think of. So there's new information. By definition, you're giving off more information to me than I can soak in and speak. So it's also a way of continuing to cover the ground and dig in. But neither one of us feels like we're repeating ourselves. We think we're expanding. I'm gathering information and you're feeling good about giving it to me. So it's information gathering and rapport building simultaneously instead of one or the other, which is what most negotiations are. So I'm going to get a lot more information. You're going to feel good about giving it to me. It's going to accelerate us towards the outcome. You know, hence why back on the suicide hotline, I can get to where I want to go in 20 minutes when other people are taking four or five, six hours in regular conversations. Yeah. You, you would use things like you, you sound anxious. Yeah. Yeah. I'm anxious. I mean, you know, and, and, uh, you know, uh, using those techniques to, to basically play back to people and get them to kind of internalize how they're coming across. Is that It's a, it's a, it's a combination of a couple of things, especially with negative emotions. uh self-awareness and deactivation simultaneously uh which until you've seen it in action you you you can't imagine that you know calling out anxiousness um frantic feelings uh concern uh you think that that uh causes a a downward spiral an increase in amplification in those emotions when a point of fact calling them out not denying it but calling them out causes a self-awareness, you know, denying it. See, I don't want you to feel anxious. I don't want you to feel frantic. Well, that's combative and challenging. It's telling somebody not to feel what they're feeling. So it triggers them in a bad way to start with, and it doesn't increase their awareness. But, you know, you seem anxious, you seem frantic. That actually calms people down because they become self-aware, and there's some interesting neuroscience it shows that it deactivates it simultaneously. 10% of the brain's negative? Is that? Yeah. Yeah. Yeah, well, why it to be negative? I mean, it's what kept us alive in the caveman days. And we've all inherited that wiring. Yeah. How often are you surprised by outcomes in negotiations that you participate in? Well, regularly. I mean, when we're using tactical empathy, I'm either surprised at how quickly we got there or where we suddenly find ourselves. I don't do most of our negotiations on a regular basis. I do some, but most of our coaches and our salespeople are getting surprised on a regular basis that suddenly people are being collaborative. The first salesperson we ever hired way back when, a young lady named Davey, who was a superstar as a salesperson. She's no longer with us. She had a different path to take. But I remember she told my son, Brandon, who trained her, she said, you know, when I first started working for you, there are a lot of real jerks that call us on the phone. And now six months later, there aren't as many jerks. She just got good at it. And she was being surprised at how much more pleasant people are when you're no longer the enemy and how quickly you can make deals. Brandon works with you at Black Swan. He used to. He went out on his own. Oh, did he? He's come from the same cloth I am. I didn't want to be told what to do by anybody, especially my father. Yeah. And he helped me build the business, and now he's out on his own charting his own path. Yeah. It's a, it's a double-edged sword. I'm my 25 year old is running a big part of our company, the franchise development piece of it. And he's an econ and finance guy. So, but it's, it is interesting working with family. I will I will tell you, and I'm interested to know if you shared it, but you know, an early entrepreneurial experience in people's lives is the number one indicator, whether they're going to have entrepreneurial success later in life. So Brandon watching you, uh, have a great career, write the book, build the business and all of that stuff probably had a major impact in the way that he views, uh, what he wants to do. Um, and, uh, and congratulations. I understand you're a grandfather. Oh yeah, I am. Uh, I actually got two grandchildren now. So granddaughter and a, and a grand, grand grandson who's just a few months old. Yeah, that's why I can't wait. I can't wait. I got at least, uh, my daughter just started law school at NYU. So that's at least three or four years out. And then my, my son's fiance is, um, pre-med at Wake. So that's three or four years out. So I'm gonna have to rent them or borrow them or get another dog. One of the three. You got hardworking kids, man. Those are some impressive, impressive educational credentials. Well, they're working it well, you know, coming from, you know, they found my, uh, they found my bag of, of high school. I was a football player. Um, and, uh, they found my bag of credentials in a trash bag in the attic and they pulled out that 2.6 grade point average. So they, they've all basically doubled it. So, um, yeah, I blame my wife. I blame my wife. Must be awesome. So, you know, as you, as you, um, as, as you think back to, uh, your career, are there any cool stories that didn't make your book? And I will say that the book is perfectly done. Every chapter just about starts with an impactful story. And then the lessons that, that are taught, uh, apply directly to how it helped resolve that situations. But is there anything on the cutting room floor that, uh, that didn't make the book yeah well you know there was a bunch of stuff for a variety of reasons depending upon how you know yeah how it fit into you know what uh tall ross by the way the guy you know the co-writer and my son brandon an unofficial co-author but tall tall knows how to tell read write a business book that's interesting to read and i'm gonna tell you that you know the first time i worked at kidnapping directly that al-qaeda was involved uh society kidnapping guy named paul johnson it was being grabbed by al-qaeda in saudi arabia at the time and you know i'm on a secure video conference call right after it gets started in dc with a bunch of you know the policy makers and decision decision people and you know they were like you know i don't know what good you guys are going to do us in this and actually they um i was insistent that that i deployed a saudi on this. And the ambassador, a guy named Oberweider, as I recall, smart guy, ran the best meeting I'd ever seen run in an embassy once I showed up in Riyadh. But his reaction was kind of like, look, I don't know how you guys are going to help, but you want to fly all the way out here and go ahead and get on a plane. It's not coming out of my budget. So in route, while I'm in the my team is writing a negotiation position paper it's it's a way that we assess situations and we're using versions of it now to assess business opportunities to make decisions in the business and when I got there Oberweider had the James Oberweider believe the man's name was had a position paper in his hand and met me when I got to the embassy and he said when you said you guys were coming out here i didn't know what good you were going to do us and now that i have this i wish you'd gotten here two days early and i remember thinking like you just give us a chance to show us how we can impact your thinking and your decision making and that was exactly the stamp that i needed and point of fact we made uh paul johnson was murdered by al-qaeda on deadline and the Saudis rounded them all up and killed them in a tactical assault. But afterwards, the Arab media portrayed the kidnappers as criminals and not terrorists, not freedom fighters. You don't want to, if you want to be a terrorist, you don't want to be called a criminal, a thug. And that's what the Arab media referred to these guys as. So it was a PR victory for us. And Oberweider wrote a letter to the director of the FBI saying that we made the world see them as the thugs and criminals that they were. And that was very gratifying as well, because while we didn't save Paul Johnson's life, it began to turn the tide against al-Qaeda at that point in time. 93% of hostage negotiations end well. 7%, the outcomes are predetermined because the people that are involved, they have no outcome. You can't get them to an outcome. Can that be changed or outcomes somewhat predetermined? And so if somebody says, you know, I'm going to die by police suicide and I'm just not coming out of here in any way, is there any crack that you can get psychologically to get them to change their mind at that point? What's your experience? No, is the short answer. I mean, there's a killing journey. vision drives decision what does that mean people have got a clear view of how they want things to go before they engage in a process and you have to recognize whether or not they're on a killing journey and whether or not and whether or not this process is part of the destination now your best chance if the communication process is part of the destination your best chance of success is to simply stop communicating because they've taken that into account and they need that to be part of the journey so you'll stop talking to someone um you'll put them on ice uh you'll hang up on them and then then that's your best chance of success now your best chance of success might be infinitesimal but you take your best chance of success and then realize that it was the best chance of success and that it was really low so there are certain things you're never going to completely throw in the towel on any negotiation any hostage negotiation you have to recognize it for what it is and then take your best chance of success which might be you know one thousand one thousandths of one percent and then you let the universe take its course you you play your role to the best of your possible ability and don't kid yourself about the way the deck was stacked before you get started involved in training the fbi and their negotiators i was and um you know it was as soon as you're out a friend of mine once said the water rushes in quickly behind you right and however they did ask me to come back uh earlier this year and i and i spoke i spoke to them uh at quantico briefly you know they had some other people and they had bernie brown and which is cool i'd never met her she's she's she's genius i mean she won me over like immediately and how insightful she was so i've got you know they're they they don't look to me for a lot they look to me for an occasional conversation they're fine on their own without yeah so how has the transition to uh business life been and uh what's um you know what do you see for the black swan group going forward are you expanding the business i know the book continues to be widely referenced and I'm sure continues to be purchased and used. What's next for you? Yeah, well, it's been great. I mean, the transition, you know, I started over as a baby entrepreneur at age 50. You know, in a public sector, you got no idea how the private sector runs and vice versa. And there's some similarities in bureaucracies, corporate bureaucracy, government bureaucracy. There are similarities. But entrepreneur life is a whole nother thing. It's a great adventure. And we probably change and adapt every year. Right now, we're in discussions to develop a non-scripted TV show, reality TV show. We'll see where that goes. You know, that might be in production next year. So working on another possible book, working on the book sells globally well in every country. Like we're in 36 countries. I mean, literally global. and probably we're starting to consult and train and teach more in Dubai on the other side of the world Dubai is a great business hub and it's a it's a great place to be for business and one of the more fascinating places on earth coast I think every place is interesting and I came to New Jersey every place is interesting to me because we're human beings are doing cool stuff so the next couple years could be very interesting we're still going to train and teach negotiation at all levels i i get a sense too that um experientially i i never thought i would get the kind of meet the kind of people that i get to meet and i get to talk to on a regular basis now and that's that's a reward in and of itself and you know bigger table um having you having you on this podcast and i mean we got verne harnish coming on next and just it's uh yeah i mean it's just it's just it's just great i mean i i i mean i created a business that was insurance restoration man i was doing i was cleaning up toilet spills like that's how i started you know and and now to to you know those we can have many many seasons to our lives and you know to go through this season and for this to be the season that i'm in i'm just thoroughly excited about it i read your book uh never split the difference it's got to be seven or eight years ago now and i committed at that time uh to become a better negotiator ultimately i talked myself out of it but um what was the trigger for you ultimately to write that book was that you knew you were transitioning into a private sector you needed it as a tool or like when i wrote my i have a book called discernment the business athletes regimen for a great life through better decisions and what it is is it's models of thought that i've learned over 25 years of building business that people can apply to their present day situations and like what are the filters what are values as a filter you know what are the filters in decision making that right that improve your decision making because nothing is 100 anything can go to zero and the quality of your decisions determines the quality of your life and the velocity of your business so man i had so many lessons uh to put in there but i really wrote it just to make sure that i got it all down at that when i sold my business in 2019 and uh is you know what was the trigger for you to sit down and say i've got to get this stuff all on paper I finally think, when we finally, and we really, Brandon and I, when we thought we had a whole system, if you will, to put together a book. Like, since I got out of the FBI and I knew I was going to be consulting and training, and no shortage of people saying, like, look, you got to write a book. I mean, you got to get a book out there, get it out there now. And that's good advice, and I didn't want to get a book out. I wanted to make sure that we had a system that worked, you know, that we had a, uh, could show the model. There was a hostage negotiator, uh, NYPD put out a book right after he got out, but it was more like here, try this and see if you can adapt it into your life. Here's how I did in hostage negotiation. Now you figured out a business negotiation and that to me, that was too soon. So I was lucky enough to start teaching business negotiation at Georgetown. And so I was teaching there with my son, Brandon is a sounding board. And after we've been doing it for several years and teaching straight hostage negotiation for business application, we had, you know, 200 written papers of examples of everything from a Wall Street negotiation to a negotiation between a husband and wife over Christmas tree that, you know, we had all the models that we needed. And then finally, you got to find the right writer, went through a lot of writers, learned what the wrong writer looks like and wanted tall Roz all along and finally got him and tall was tall as a genius most writers just right and tall is actually a great researcher and a great thinker and in having worked with other writers I had no idea how viable him doing the research was going to be and and giving him insight and asking us hard questions you know and we'd you forget what it's like to not know and tall really brought that to the table a lot also i i had dinner with him the other night we talked about you know why i think high anchoring is a bad idea and when we were working on the book he'd say you know everybody else all the academics say you shouldn't high anchor i go now high anchoring is stupid and he said that's not enough of an explanation you're gonna have to go into a lot more depth than that because there's some really credible incredible people out here that disagree with you and that working having tall bring stuff up like that was really great work so that the journey led me to tall after i'd been out for geez five six years before i finally got tall on board as a as a collaborator iterative process they had to keep telling me jeff this book is not everything you know about everything it's got it's got a flow you know save it for the next book uh and you're trying to get it to where it can really help people and it and people can execute on the tactical stuff that you give them is is uh it's hard i'm interesting i'm interested to know have you developed anything about the high anchoring uh can you can you expand on that for just a minute because i thought because i always was taught like hey anchor high right and now you've you've set a new normal and that's where negotiation is going to start no unless you drive the deal from the table like it was always my gut instinct that high extreme anchoring drives deals from the tables and if you look at the studies and you should look at all the studies and first of all every study is flawed and all data is flawed so you have to just decide whether or not the flaws are fatal in your in your point of view and how much data there is and whether or not you like your source like there's a couple things that I truly believe in, and I got one source on it only, but I'm not satisfied with the source. Now, the high anchoring data is all on artificial negotiations among students in business schools or in classes. Now, why is that flawed? First of all, they're not themselves. They don't have anything in the game. It's a pretend situation. The bigger flaw is from having done all these, you put two students together in a simulated negotiation they're going to talk one time they're going to talk for 45 minutes the only way they're going to feel like they failed is if they get no deal and they also are not going to negotiate with each other again in the same scenario it's not a series of negotiations so somebody starts high anchoring and it does reset the zone of possible agreement, as my Harvard brothers and sisters called it, the ZOPA, in artificial situations or in one-offs or in stuff where you're never going to deal with anybody again, which is not the norm. In reality, what it does is drive deals from the table. And I'm looking for this right and left. I finally, I pick up Ned Colletti's book, The Big Chair. Ned Colletti was GM for the Los Angeles Dodgers his first year. They went from the first phenomenal uh business sports month and he's got a story when he was with the cubs that they had a free agent they really wanted to retain they really wanted this guy and this guy's agent came in with a ridiculous off a ridiculous ask and it comes with an f you and walked away and then ned's book is literally littered with instances where somebody came in with a high anchor or an extreme anchor and the other side just went like f you and walked away and i'm sitting with ned in la at dinner a couple of years ago and i go like you know this is what i've seen in your book i'm convinced that high anchoring makes deals disappear that you should have made and ned is one of the most successful negotiation practitioners ever and by based on his track record, agreed with me completely. And every business negotiation person that I've spoken to that has come to learn that lesson and they've learned that they're making more deals, staying away from extreme anchoring. You know, there's another reason to avoid it. Like your extreme anchor might not be extreme. It might be low. And you cost yourself money thinking you were coming in an extreme and instead you hit the other guy's sweet spot and there was more money on the table you left on the table. yeah that's true so there's all these reasons to let the other side go first and just gather information see where you are yeah if you throw an implausible offer out at me i don't i think you just threw something up there and you're not taking me seriously you really didn't think about it maybe i think you're lazy and i'm not really insulted i just think well you know this this is a i'm gonna throw nine 20 deals out there lose 19 and see if i can get one one idiot to take it it. Yeah. Yeah. And a lot of people think they're very successful doing that. And they just have no idea how much money they're leaving on the table, how many deals are walking away because that's their approach. Yeah. Yeah. And in the example of the students, neither one of those kids wants to go back into the classroom without a deal. Yeah. They're going to get a deal. It's just a matter of where is it? Yeah. They're going to get a deal. And they're also like, time after time after time, they're going to sit down once for 45 minutes and at the end of 45 minutes wherever they are they're going to shake hands and they're going to go back to getting ready to go drinking or working on the other homework they're working or whatever else they're doing yeah well chris we're we're heading towards the end of our time and i really enjoyed this very much i really appreciate you jumping on i'll ask you uh with all of your experience and uh worldly experience if you had one sentence to make an impact in somebody's life you know what something that you you believe and you think other people should think about what might that be yeah and then and after i answer that question i want to tell you about this thing we're doing on fireside which i think is yeah yeah absolutely the uh the one sentence uh would be like um take the time to make somebody feel understood and just see where that takes you and it's it it's you know people used to say your negotiation is very zen like and i'd be like zen what the hell is that i don't know what that is you know leave me alone but it's really letting go of the outcome to find a better outcome it makes life much more interesting makes my life much more of an adventure like if you don't really know where this is going. You'll be delighted far more than you're frustrated. Well, I tell you what I thought of immediately when you said that is, uh, my, my marital life. And after so many, or your, your, your, uh, whoever your key relationship is in your life, man, after a while, you just forget to understand where they're coming from and you gloss over it. And, uh, that's probably one of the biggest you know he doesn't get me she doesn't get me they don't understand me uh it's probably where it starts to unravel a little bit yeah yeah yeah well said yeah so what's going on with fireside fireside is this new web 3 if you will application uh you find it on your on your um on your iphone or on your android in the uh in the app store it was originally pitched us as an interactive podcast, a live interactive podcast. And what it really has turned out to be for my company is group coaching. So we do an hour a week, every week. I'm on once a month. And we're talking about our cutting edge topics, our most salient, what's most important at the time. You'll get a short discussion of whatever that topic is. And then it's a Q&A session. which really ends up to be group coaching. And we normally charge, and I charge $5,000 an hour for group coaching. If you want an individual coaching, it's going to cost you about that much for an hour, which means a month's worth of this coaching is going to cost you $20,000. Fisat is $1,000 a year for an entire year's worth of coaching. Now, people sign on from all over the world. When I was on just about two weeks ago, one of the people that was on and was asking me questions was on a mountaintop in Tibet. So you get on with like-minded entrepreneurs. People are getting better at negotiation. They want to learn. Somebody asks a question that's exactly what you were thinking or a different take on what you're struggling with. and it has been it's filled in a real gap for people on the learning journey with us pretty much after the book in master class because that's static learning like yeah no matter how many times you turn that page page is still going to say the same thing the master class um episodes lessons they're the same every time and you need to get into live group coaching and Otherwise, the live group coaching is extremely expensive, and this is a way to get it at a ridiculous price. There's always more power when the group comes together. Always more power. So that sounds fantastic. And those prices sound very reasonable to me, and I bet people don't negotiate you off of them very often. What we do is we over-deliver. That's right. You make it a bargain. That's right. That's right. Chris, this has been awesome, man. Thank you. Jeff, my pleasure. Thank you for having me on, man. It's been a real pleasure. I enjoyed the conversation. Yeah, me as well. So where can you direct people to either get the information on Fireside or to reach out to you or the Black Swan Group? Well, the website is BlackSwanLTD.com, B-L-A-C-K-S-W-A-N-L-T-D.com. Upper right-hand corner is a tab for our newsletter, which comes out weekly. It's complimentary. three. And there's one actionable article every Tuesday morning, plus notifications about training Fireside, a new video that we might have out. But it's actionable and it's useful and it's concise. And that's really what you need from an information source, concise and actionable. Awesome. Well, people won't have a problem finding you. And as always, I have been Jeff Duden with Chris Voss, and we have been on the home front, simply building the world's most responsible franchise platform, encouraging entrepreneurs to take action and transform their life. This sounds like you. Check us out today at homefrontbrands.com and start your next chapter of greatness, building your dynasty on the home front. I will be looking for you here. Thank you.

⚙️ Pipeline jobs

StageStatusAtt.UpdatedError
download done 1/3 2026-05-27 20:22:17 yt-dlp exited 1: ERROR: [youtube] bOjehkDJ9tA: Sign in to confirm you’re not a …
transcribe done 1/3 2026-05-27 20:38:38
summarize done 1/3 2026-05-28 08:00:25
embed done 1/3 2026-06-30 06:41:47

📄 Описание YouTube

Показать
Get a FREE DOWNLOADABLE COPY of Jeff Dudan's Book Discernment HERE:
https://podcast.homefrontbrands.com/en-us/discernment

What can an FBI hostage negotiator teach entrepreneurs, franchise owners, and business leaders about getting better outcomes?

A lot.

In this episode of Unemployable with Jeff Dudan, Jeff sits down with Chris Voss — former FBI hostage negotiator, author of the global bestseller Never Split the Difference, and founder of The Black Swan Group.

Chris spent more than two decades negotiating life-or-death situations around the world. Now he teaches the same negotiation frameworks to business leaders, entrepreneurs, and Fortune 500 companies.

Get a FREE DOWNLOADABLE COPY of Jeff Dudan's Book Discernment HERE:
https://podcast.homefrontbrands.com/en-us/discernment

In this conversation, Chris and Jeff break down:

• The power of tactical empathy
• Why making people feel understood changes behavior
• The hidden danger of high anchoring in negotiations
• How to slow down and avoid deal fixation
• The negotiation techniques Chris used in real hostage situations
• Why most people unknowingly leave value on the table

Whether you’re negotiating deals, leading teams, building companies, or navigating everyday conversations, the principles in this episode can change the way you communicate and make decisions.

Learn more about Chris Voss and The Black Swan Group here:
https://www.blackswanltd.com

Black Swan Group Negotiation Resources and Newsletter:
https://www.blackswanltd.com/newsletter/

Chris Voss Fireside Coaching Platform:
https://firesidechat.com/chrisvoss

If you enjoy conversations with elite entrepreneurs, operators, and thinkers, subscribe to the channel and turn on notifications.

👍 Like the video
💬 Comment your biggest takeaway
📤 Share this with someone who negotiates for a living

This podcast is brought to you by Homefront Brands — building the world’s most responsible franchise platform and helping entrepreneurs transform their lives while serving their communities.

Learn more about Homefront Brands here:
https://homefrontbrands.com


#ChrisVoss #JeffDudan #UnemployablePodcast #Negotiation #NeverSplitTheDifference #TacticalEmpathy #Leadership #Entrepreneurship #BusinessStrategy #Sales #CommunicationSkills #EmotionalIntelligence #HostageNegotiation #BusinessGrowth #HomefrontBrands