← все видео

How his AI-first services company grew $0 to $40M ARR in one year. | Eric Foster, Founder of Tenex

PMF Show · 2025-12-01 · 1ч 11м · 335 просмотров · YouTube ↗

Топики: launch-first-customers

Аудио ещё не скачано.

📝 Summary

model=openai/gpt-oss-120b · prompt=summary-v7 · 18 738→2 054 tokens · 2026-05-28 08:56:35

🎯 Главная суть

Eric Foster создал Tenex (10X) — AI‑first сервис в кибербезопасности, который за первый год работы достиг $43 млн ARR, используя полностью AI‑нативный подход, продавая клиентам готовый результат (защиту от атак), а не отдельный продукт.


🚀 Путь предпринимателя: от первых компьютеров до CISO

Eric начал заниматься бизнесом в старшей школе, собирая компьютеры в конце 80‑х и создавая первые веб‑сайты для небольших компаний в начале 90‑х. Позже он построил несколько компаний в сфере ИТ и кибербезопасности, включая роль первого CISO в региональном банке, где отвечал за всю технологическую архитектуру и безопасность.


📡 Как выглядела кибербезопасность в 90‑х

Тогда атаки осуществлялись через «war dialing» — автоматический набор телефонных номеров в поисках модемов, а вредоносное ПО распространялось на флоппи‑дисках. Защита была дорогой, а большинство компаний использовали простые сервисы, потому что платить за время в сети было обычным делом.


🏢 Становление Sideris и её продажа

В 2020‑х Eric запустил Sideris — одну из топ‑5 компаний в сегменте Managed Detection and Response (MDR). За четыре года компания выросла до 300 сотрудников и была продана частному equity‑фонду, контролирующему компанию Роберта Херджавека. Объединённый бизнес оценивался в $1 млрд, а Sideris принесла более $500 млн дохода.


🤖 Поворот к искусственному интеллекту

Ключевой инсайт: существующие MSSP‑компании не используют AI эффективно. Eric увидел, что ускоренные вычисления (accelerated compute) позволяют делать в разы больше за те же ресурсы. Это стало фундаментом для создания AI‑нативного продукта, способного выполнять работу, которую раньше делали десятки специалистов.


📈 Концепция 10X: «один человек = десяти»

Название отражает цель: каждый сотрудник Tenex, подкреплённый AI, способен выполнить работу, которую раньше требовали 10 человек. Это достигается за счёт AI‑ко‑пилотов, автоматической кластеризации и анализа тысяч событий в секунду, а также человеческого контроля в критических моментах.


🛠️ Продукт vs результат: продажа исхода, а не инструмента

Tenex продаёт «безопасность», а не отдельный сервис. Клиент получает готовый результат — обнаружение и реагирование на угрозы быстрее и дешевле, чем при найме собственной команды или работе с традиционным MSSP. Пример: AI за секунду делает работу, которую аналитик обычно тратит час.


🔍 Прозрачность и «стеклянный ящик»

В отличие от большинства конкурентов, Tenex открыто показывает клиентам метрики, алгоритмы и логи AI‑принятия решений. Это устраняет страх перед «чёрным ящиком» и позволяет клиенту контролировать процесс, сохраняя человеческий надзор.


📊 Метрики эффективности


🏎️ Как Tenex масштабирует продажи и внедрение


👤 Founder‑led sales: роль основателя в продажах

Eric лично ведёт переговоры с топ‑менеджерами, используя свои 30‑летние связи в отрасли. Он подчёркивает, что клиенты покупают не только технологию, но и доверие к основателю, его видение и способность быстро доставлять результат.


🤝 Партнёрские стратегии и каналоведение

Успех Tenex во многом зависит от правильных партнёров, которые уже работают с целевыми клиентами. Партнёры получают готовый AI‑продукт, а Tenex — доступ к клиентской базе без длительных продажных циклов.


📈 Быстрый рост ARR: от первого контракта к $40 млн


🛡️ Почему традиционные MSSP отстают

Традиционные провайдеры полагаются на ручную работу аналитиков, что ограничивает их способность обрабатывать миллионы событий. Их модели часто «чёрные ящики», что вызывает недоверие у крупных корпоративных клиентов, требующих прозрачности и доказуемой эффективности.


🌐 Позиция Tenex в отрасли и сравнение с конкурентами


📚 Уроки из истории: инновационный дилемма и переосмысление бизнеса

Eric сравнивает текущий переход к AI с переходом от типографии к ПК. Компании, пытающиеся «добавить» AI к существующим процессам, теряют гибкость, тогда как стартапы, построенные с нуля, могут быстро захватить рынок.


🧩 Пример 30‑секундного демо

AI автоматически группирует 30 схожих алертов, генерирует сводный отчёт, назначает плейбук и подготавливает все необходимые данные для аналитика. В результате аналитик получает готовый к действию набор информации за секунды, а не часы ручного анализа.


📈 Прогнозы роста и экономический эффект AI


🧭 Практический совет для AI‑стартапов

Тщательно сравнивайте модели: Google Gemini предлагает лучшую стоимость и производительность, чем многие конкуренты. Используйте мульти‑модельный подход (OpenAI, Anthropic, Grok) в зависимости от задачи, но не игнорируйте возможности Gemini.


📚 Ключевые выводы из пути к продукт‑маркету

📜 Transcript

en · 14 743 слов · 161 сегментов · flagged: phrase_run (1 dropped, q=0.99)

Показать текст транскрипта
We're standing at the precipice, not of the next dot-com boom. We're standing at the precipice of the PC revolution. When people look around and go like, oh, is this AI thing a bubble? Or, you know, is this going to take away a bunch of jobs? Or all of the other sort of doomerism that a lot of people are coming from. You're the same people who in the 1980s were looking around at all the office jobs and going like, what do you mean everybody's going to be working on computers? We'll probably land this first year. call it 43 million in revenue wow first year from first dollar that doesn't even compute the whole point of a startup is ultimately to find product market fit right and once you find that product market fit you should throw as much fuel on the fire as you can and if an input of a dollar is producing a business value output of five dollars you should just keep doing that until you have as much business value or until it starts to decrease Absolutely. Big fan, Pablo. Thank you so much for having me. I'm excited to jump through your story. You said that you're actually on a track to be the next Wiz, which is insane thing to be on because, I mean, there are, as many people know, one of the fastest companies to hit $100 million in top line, certainly the fastest kind of cybersecurity company to do that. And you've only been around for a year already. You raised a seed round from E16 and raised a $27 million Series A. So you're clearly off into the races. The plan here is to go as deep as humanly possible, really understand what it's like to be on a company that's growing so fast and what it takes to do that. Before we kind of jump into that in 10x and how that'll happen, maybe just give us a little bit of background context on you personally before 2025, before you started 10x. Absolutely. So, man, this is one of those stories you hear that's a overnight sensation, 30 years in the making, basically. I've been An entrepreneur my entire life, you know, like I think a lot of the other entrepreneurs started when I was very young, started hustling, started building businesses and trying to find ways to earn money and be one of these contributing commercial members of society from a very young age. But, you know, really serious about it, built my first business in high school that carried me through college. Traditional business or like a tech business? Yeah. So in the very early days of the computer industry, I was very fortunate to get exposed to computers at a very, very young age. Back when you were still building hobbyist computers before even the Dell and Gateway era of being able to purchase and order so much of the commercial hardware. Like I had the opportunity to build my own computer in the very early days on the, you know, in the hobbyist world. What year are you talking about? Like, you know, 1989. Oh, wow. ish times, you know, so, you know, very young, but got plugged into it very, very early. And then the Apple II and the Apple IIe and the, you know, very early days of the computer industry. And I was hooked from, you know, day one. So in the early nineties, like, you know, 92, 93, I started a business putting together computers for people. And that turned into very early web design. and networking and you know some other stuff like that focused on small and mid-sized businesses basically you know in those early days very early internet you know dial-up internet and everything else you had a few different businesses that were really trying to get ahead of that and you know my speciality was going into like small credit unions or dentist's office or people like that who had money who were like you know look we want to install these eight or 10 computers and have them networked and talk to each other. And we want to dial up modems so we can get on the internet and do these sort of things. So that exposed me both to technology and the business and then to, you know, to the internet and ultimately to cybersecurity. I just sort of happened to get into that side of it very early on, you know, from personal interest in bulletin boards and gaming and a lot of other components like that. So long story short, I've been doing cybersecurity basically now for 32 years. So I say it's late 90s sort of thing. Yeah, mid to late 90s is when I first got into cybersecurity and have been fighting the good fight in cybersecurity for a long time. I've had a couple different companies along the way. I've been very fortunate to be part of some really great teams and help build out some really great organizations and really led all of that path, all of those scars, all of that effort, all of those lessons and learnings. are what ultimately led to 10x. What even was cybersecurity like in the mid 90s? I'm curious. Must have been a completely different world. It absolutely was. I mean, you had a lot of what we called war dialing. You know, in the early internet days, some of your listeners will be too young to even know any of this, like the whole internet was all modem based. And so you had literal phone lines, and your computer would connect, like one computer would connect to one other computer. on somewhere else and that would be essentially how you would get onto this whole giant network that was the internet and you know some of the first computer intrusions were literally you had russians or chinese or other hackers that would literally just dial phone numbers with a computer looking for another modem to pick up and if that modem picked up you could send it some commands and see if you could get into it and so a lot of those early internet intrusions and the early cyber security stuff it was either that sort of attack via a modem of somebody literally calling your computer out of the blue or a lot of it was malware that was coming over literal physical disks you go to best buy and buy a video game that would come on like 27 floppy disks that you would turn in and install and then people would share those with each other you know so like oh man, I got this game and I copied it to these 27 floppy disks and you give it to your buddy, except your computer had some malware on it. And so now this floppy disk has some malware on it. And so your computer would get infected. And like, it's just absolutely insane, the sort of scale of this kind of stuff in the very early days. But you know, cybersecurity, the whole thing exists because that's where the money was. It's the same, that old Willie Horton quote of like, you know, why did you rob banks? Well, it's because that's where the money was. It was the same thing in cybersecurity. The moment you started to put like payments online, the moment you had computers doing financial transactions, very quickly thereafter, you had cyber criminals who were trying to get in the middle of that or disrupt it or make money from it. You know, this is many years before the concept of ransomware existed. It was just literally people looking to break in and do specific harm. It's also funny, a lot of it in the very early days was all just use of services. like it cost money to be on the internet you paid in a lot of cases you were paying literally like by the minute to be on the internet and so you had people who would break into your computer just to use its resources just to access the internet and just to do that kind of thing because nothing like aws or anything else existed it's very different time very much so so during those 30 years like were you mainly working at other companies doing cyber or did you kind of have your own thing Yeah, so I started that initial business helping early technology forward companies get on the internet, basically. And then that turned into web design. And then we ultimately built that company up, had a few employees, and we sold it off. And there was a big consolidation in the industry of a lot of businesses were coming up and buying up web hosting companies just to acquire customers. roll stuff up. So when I sold that company, I kind of took that entrepreneurial spirit and got a job at a financial services firm. But it was a financial services firm that basically was looking to get on the internet for the first time, but it was a much bigger bank, a super regional, publicly traded financial services firm. And very interestingly, very fortunate for my career, the CEO at the time was a very young guy in the grand scheme of things, a gentleman by the name of Sandy Kemper, Alexander Kemper, who uh basically brought this concept of silicon valley he'd been out to silicon valley and the you know and this is uh you're talking the mid 90s here had been out to silicon valley had seen what was coming of the dot-com boom and brought a lot of those concepts back to this family-owned publicly traded sleepy midwestern bank and he came out and said we're gonna put this bank on the internet we're gonna do online banking we're gonna do a bunch of other really interesting stuff, including we ended up incubating a tech startup inside of the bank that I got to be a part of where we were providing IT services to other banks, basically these community banks. And so it was a very natural evolution. I'd started my previous company providing these network and IT services and security services to these other small credit unions. It was like, okay, this is actually a really good fit. I'm going to come over here and help this bank get on the internet and help them be secure. And that kind of started my corporate career, served there in a couple different roles. Eventually was their first chief information security officer. So I was responsible for all cybersecurity there at the bank. And then... was responsible for technology architecture for them. So like planning out, you know, their technology investments and some other things like that. And then jumped from there into a fun career kind of on every side of the table. So I took the background of being a CISO, being a, you know, being the buyer, if you will. And then went out and became a consultant, went out and became a, what we call a reseller, you know, the people who are helping other companies purchase and implement technology. And then I jumped into the startup game. and kind of have never looked back from there. What was your last startup like before 10x? So most recently, I've spent a little bit of time took a little bit of a sabbatical and helped a couple different CEO friends of mine basically kind of parachuted into some short tours of duty to help them out trying to help do my best to help them through some challenging times. You know, it's always the whole zero to one and one to 10 stages, you know, the early stages of starting a company and trying to grow it and scale it are the most incredibly challenging. And I had two different friends who'd started two different venture-backed companies and could really use some help. And so I spent a little bit of time parachuting in and helping them. But that sabbatical was driven off of, you know, before 10X, we started a company called Sideris. And the long story short on it, we started it. to really change the cybersecurity industry. We grew it very aggressively. In essentially a four-year run, we became, I think, pretty widely considered as one of the top five companies in our industry in the managed detection and response industry. And then we ran a process on it where we were going to go out and take additional investment to grow and scale the company. And we ended up essentially getting an offer we couldn't refuse from private equity. to purchase the entire thing. And that was quite a trip because we ended up selling to a private equity company that owned controlling interest in Robert Herjavec's cybersecurity company. If you're familiar with that name, you know, the Shark Tank guy. A lot of people don't realize Mr. Herjavec is... his whole career is cyber security. You know, before he was a shark and, you know, most of those sharks, they all come from a business background, right? They had some business. Robert's business happened to be my business, cyber security. And so what ended up happening is my company got merged with Robert's company. So it was, you know, very surreal. This thing that I dreamed up in the shower and spent four years growing and building all of a sudden now is owned by the shark tank or, you know, is headed by the shark tank guys owned by private equity. the world of business is like that but like every now and then you just you find yourself in these movie like setups and you're just like what does have What's going on right now? How do I get here? Yeah, quite literally. I mean, very, very surreal. And my wife and I were huge Shark Tank fans. Like we'd seen every episode. We watched it all the time. We discussed it. You know, it was like one of our very few family shows that we like were all in on. And then to have that, you know, be this outcome. And then next thing you know, I'm working directly with and for Robert Herjavec and working with him every day. I'm on his plane flying out to LA. And how big was the company, by the way, when it got acquired? We were about 300 employees. Okay. So we, you know, we. Thaisal. Yeah. In four years, you know, from zero, you know, and man, that's always the crazy thing, the crazy fun time, anything, you know, that zero to one concept, right? You know, you're taking something that doesn't exist and you're willing it into existence and you're putting it into the world. You're getting your first customers, you're getting your first revenue, and then jump into that next phase of like one to 10 of, all right, you know. we've got some initial product market fit we've got some traction we're going to pour fuel on the fire and then you know grow into that next stage so yeah and in only four years building to like 300 employees building to real serious revenue and then having a you know what was a life-changing for a lot of people outcome of being able to sell that company you know as one of the things i was most proud about it was watching the checks go out to all the people around me that we were able to take care of where you're like you know, not just about me, not just about the major investors, but like seeing the people who came in, worked hard every day and got, you know, in some cases, some life changing money out of out of just that four year run. You know, that's what it's all about. That's, you know, it's why we do this. Well, I assume it must have been in the hundreds of millions, the exercise given the three employees and their amount of growth. Yeah, when we put the two companies together, it was essentially a billion dollar company. So, you know, we basically built about a call it four or five hundred million dollar two companies coming together to create that merged billion dollar company. Incredible. And how long did you end up working with Robert after post acquisition? You know, I kind of came in, knew very early that this kind of wasn't going to be the direction that I wanted to go personally. Nothing against it, nothing against Robert, nothing against the team. Just, I think for an entrepreneur, there's a very big difference of like being at a multi-billion dollar, you know, thousand employee company versus the like. this is my thing that we started and kind of that world. So I met all my obligations to them, you know, but was ultimately there, you know, I think less than a year post transition was what they needed me to kind of shepherd the company through to the next phase. So let's go deep maybe on 10X. Like tell me the origin story. What is the initial idea? I assume happens at some point in 2024. But you tell me, like, how do you start 10X? Yeah, you know, it really is. It's the 30, 35 year overnight success story, right? It's every lesson that I've learned in my career, all of the great people that I've worked with, worked for, learned from, but it also all really starts with a couple really key, I think, observations, hypotheses, and learnings. First and foremost, I think any truly good startup founder, not all of them, I guess, maybe, but a lot of them have this same thing, which is they're solving their own problem. I'm fixing a problem that I specifically had that has bothered me forever. And really the exact journey of how I got here, I like to use, I'm a big car guy. I like to use the Ferdinand Porsche quote if you go read his autobiography of why he started Porsche. He uses this really great line, which is looking around and not seeing the car of my dreams, I decided to build it myself. That's really how I got here was ultimately in this whole journey, I was in what was at the time my third CISO role, Chief Information Security Officer, you know, helping companies protect themselves in a cybersecurity perspective. And my CFO at the time basically said, I couldn't do what I wanted to do. I couldn't build out the team the way that I wanted to, that I felt was what was necessary to protect the business. He's like, you've got to go out and buy a managed service, which if your listeners aren't completely familiar with this process, a whole lot of cybersecurity and obviously a whole lot of other services industries are based off of this concept of you know you're not doing it yourself you're going out and hiring a partner who's going to come and do it for you and the concept is it's cheaper because it's a shared services model you know instead of me hiring 15 people i can go out and contract with somebody who's gonna give me a timeshare of 15 people and it's going to be more cost effective i basically pushed back a ton on my cfo and said you don't understand there's nobody out here from a managed services perspective, from a managed security services specifically, that's worth working with. They're all either ridiculously high priced or they're really terrible quality. And that started me on a journey in partnership with this legendary cybersecurity entrepreneur to try to change that essentially. It was, I need a great managed service. I don't believe any of the companies that are out there are doing it right. I'm going to start one. That was sort of the genesis of my previous company of Sideris. And then once we sold that to private equity and kind of seen what I built go off into the ether into a different direction, I still sat back and had that same challenge. I didn't believe I was ultimately successful in my mission. I hadn't completely transformed the cybersecurity industry. You know, we'd built a great company. We'd built one of the top five MDRs. But if you went back and looked at it, it was like, I didn't completely change everything. What exactly did Sideris do? Like what problem did it solve? Yeah, it's in this industry called managed security services or managed detection and response as sort of the flagship product. But the ultimate concept is it's cybersecurity services, you know, cybersecurity delivered as a service to people. Okay, so it was an MSP itself. Yeah. Just a really big, fast growing MSP. Exactly. And ultimately, and I say with all respect to everybody there, everybody involved. It became one of the top five best, but it just became another MSSP. That's great. You built a great business that's providing a quality service to people and changed a lot of people's lives, but it wasn't different. It was the same. And changed the game. Yeah, the nature of what you're doing is the same, just better educated. Exactly. And so the big inflection point for me was artificial intelligence. I believe, and I believe so firmly. that artificial intelligence or what Jensen calls accelerated compute, we're standing at the precipice, not of the next dot-com boom. We're standing at the precipice of the PC revolution. When people look around and go like, oh, is this AI thing a bubble? Or, you know, is this going to take away a bunch of jobs or all of the other sort of doomerism that a lot of people are coming from? You're the same people who in the 1980s were looking around at all the office jobs and going like, What do you mean everybody's going to be working on computers? Like, you don't understand. We've got all these secretaries and they've got typewriters and like they do all this sort of stuff. Artificial intelligence is the next computer. It's the next computing interface. And we're going to be at the level of like post bubble saturation. I like to use this example with people. When every single business you go and talk to is using artificial intelligence the same way they're using a computer or the internet. And what do I mean by that? So like the easy example, your neighborhood taco truck. If you went back 20 years ago in your neighborhood taco truck, you'd be like, why in the world would these guys have a computer or be on the internet? And now if you go to your neighborhood taco truck, you'd go, why the hell aren't these guys using a computer and on the internet? Like, and guess what? They all are. They're on Google Maps. They're on DoorDash, you know, in some cases. They're on Facebook and social media. They've got a website. They're doing online ordering. They've got a Square Payments app on their iPhone, which has more compute than what we sent to the moon. It has more compute than some of those big bank mainframes that I started my career working on, literally in the power of, you know, in the palm of their hand. Your taco truck has all of this that is core to its business. I believe artificial intelligence is going to do the same thing to the entirety of the workforce. I believe it's going to change absolutely everything. And I think especially it's going to change the fundamental nature of the services industry. And so our concept, you know, literally even down to the name of the company, 10X, an order of magnitude, we believe firmly that we can accomplish the mission that I originally dreamed up before starting my last company of changing the face of cybersecurity by making it better and faster and more cost effective for everybody. And that is our real true mission. And we believe we can do that because our people are an order of magnitude better, faster, more cost effective. Because if one person can do the work of 10, you know, what historically would have been 10, what we can do isn't, oh man, we're going to need a whole lot less people. It's, we're going to be able to do a whole lot more work. we're going to be able to accomplish a whole lot more. It's the same thing with software developers, man. It's like what's crazy to me if people are like, oh, AI is going to mean we don't need software developers. I, again, showing my age here, but like I had the same arguments with people. I grew up on assembly and COBOL. Like that's what I learned when I first started my software engineering career. And when object-oriented programming came out, people were like, oh, you're making it too easy to do all this and you're going to put a bunch of software engineers out of work and everything else. It's like, no, what happened is 15 years later, every company of like mid-sized business up hired software developers because they could build things for their business. I think it's going to be the exact same thing. I think artificial intelligence is going to produce this employment boom, this productivity boom. I think it's ultimately going to drive down costs of a lot of things. And that's ultimately going to be way better everybody involved. There's this very famous financial law that as prices fall, consumption goes up, not down. And I think that's what we're going to see. I would tend to agree. I mean, the big thing that people will say this time is different is, oh, we're going to get to the singularity. And after that, there's just no point of humans. Now, I would argue certainly everything that we're seeing so far doesn't point to that. It points to this being the same, as you said, as any other previous technology, which was really an accelerant and driver productivity. And I think the best kind of analogy that i've heard of that's just super clear it's like let's say you want to dig a hole you know you want a lot of jobs just tell everybody to dig with their hands you need like a thousand people they're already giving shovels or you just get attracted to do it one time i mean you kind of be an idiot to do anything but the most effective way of digging a hole and then it just so happens that society and capitalism is such that new jobs and new ways to add value form around that. And ultimately, that is the essence of productivity. Because if we were all doing the same thing as 100 years ago, there would be no GDP growth, there would be no productivity. But the only question that somebody could say is, okay, but this is different because AI is going to get to a point where it's like, you just sit back, close your eyes, and everything gets done. I guess, I don't know. I guess that's a philosophical question. But certainly, there's nothing that we're seeing so far that points to that. It points more to this 10x phenomenon of you just can get to do a lot more. either hire more developers or new jobs when they're creating around it. Exactly. Yeah, I couldn't agree more. And, you know, in fact, it is our fundamental philosophy as a company. We believe so much in the human, in the human-led approach to cybersecurity. You know, the analogy a lot of people use for us at 10X were kind of the Tesla self-driving car approach. And if you go back to that, one, I would tell you, like, self-driving cars is actually a much easier problem space than cybersecurity. And... think about the journey we've been on with self-driving cars. Think about how many years we had when you first got in your self-driving Tesla and it was put both hands on the wheel, keep your eye on the road at all times, and if you deviate from that, we're going to send an alarm because we have to have the human in the loop guiding the car down the road. You know, and it's only literally what, you know, a decade plus later that it's like, okay, now the car can drive itself from point A to point B, but there's still a human behind the wheel to take an escalation from the car if there's a problem or these other specific scenarios. So that's our approach. It's a human-centric approach to manage security services and to manage detection and response, but it's ultimately helping companies fight evil, which is really what cybercrime is. It's, you know, we're going out and... trying to fight the bad guys on behalf of our customers, helping them be more secure, helping them avoid being attacked, being compromised, losing money, losing market share, business disruption, all the other things that happen. And we're doing that in a way that is better than what it's historically done, faster, way faster than what's been historically done, and way more cost-effective. And ultimately, we believe if we can truly democratize that to the entire world, we're going to change everything. cybersecurity is one of these really interesting things. Like my 30-year career in it, and I wrote a big, you know, massive about this you can find on my socials if anybody cares. But like, we've basically been losing this fight every year that I've been in this industry. The bad guys win more than the good guys. It's war. And we've just been ceding territory constantly to the bad guys. You know, if you go look at the big industry stats, we lost about 1.5 trillion of GDP last year to cybercrime. That's a ludicrous number. It's way more than how much economic benefit is created by all the cybersecurity companies. And you look at that and go, we have to do something about that. This is what our true mission is. You know, we're a very mission-driven company here at 10X. And the whole idea is we're not just trying to build one of the fastest growing companies in history. That's a byproduct. What we're trying to do is, as cliche as it is, we're trying to change the world. We're trying to make the internet a safer place. We're trying to let your business and... other people's businesses be more secure online, not lose as much money to cybercrime, and thus have more money to invest in their business, have more money to hire another person, have more money to pay that entry level employee or whatever else. Well, it's funny, cybersecurity is one of these things. I mean, it is very much this kind of, you know, circular thing where, you know, it's defense and offense. And so obviously offense changes, defense changes to that. But from somebody that's an outsider, not by any means cybersecurity expert, and I talk to, you know, a Huntress or Xonias or now 10x or, you know, a bunch of different. And it's like from the outside looking in, you're like, every company sounds the same, right? It's like at the end of the day, we're going to make your network secure. You know, we're going to do threat detection, like we're going to stop the attacks. And the flip side is most of these companies, at least the ones I talked to, like they're successful. So it's obviously they are providing real value. And yet, you know, the story really doesn't change. So maybe as a question to you, that's the philosophy. It's AI is going to, you know, make services more effective. It's going to make cybersecurity more effective. What does. the product MVP V1 look like to you as you're thinking through it and again, like late 2024-ish? Yeah. I mean, this is, you're talking kind of this early stage, this thought. I see artificial intelligence come into the market. I see the early adoption. I get to see not just the LLMs, but this is one of the other interesting parts of this. Like one I mentioned before that I'd parachuted in to help a couple different founders. Both of those founders. were doing artificial intelligence. One was a defense company that was doing it for the military around computer vision and some other interesting AI analysis. And then the other was in the cybersecurity space that was doing AI analysis of malware. And I saw the power that these guys were building into their company in some very narrow use case. I got to see a lot of how the military was thinking about the adoption of AI, you know, and we're talking 2022, 2023. you know, what we were able to do. And this is the other dirty secret of all this, right? It's machine learning that a lot of people consider a component of artificial intelligence. You know, we've been doing that for 10, 15 years in cybersecurity. This is not a new concept. What is this incredible new concept is this fundamental accelerated compute. It's the ability to do so much more with so much less ultimately than what we could do with traditional software, with traditional legacy compute. And so I saw these trends come together and I had this really strong conviction that we could build an AI native company and an AI native product and an AI native service that would be that true order of magnitude differentiator, better, faster, everything else. And a big part of it, I'm so blessed in so many different ways in my life, but I think one of the only reasons that we're in this category where Crunchbase is literally putting us right alongside of Wiz and talking about all this. I'll tell you that story about blowing up my phone later, but you have these kind of amazing moments. In part, I'm blessed because I did this before and because I sold my own company. So you, I'm sure you, your listener is very familiar with this concept called the innovator's dilemma. And I believe, like I said, we're at this precipice of this amazing shift. We're at the early days of the PC industry where all of a sudden you're going to go from office workers. working on paper or typewriters to computers and the productivity boost that that's going to drive. If AI has that big of an effect, and I think it's actually going to be bigger than that because, you know, Satya has this great insight on why he's all in on the AI boom is because every platform shift is additive to all the others. The PC revolution led to the internet. And the internet was so powerful because it included the PC revolution. And then mobile came along and it included the internet and the PC revolution. And then, you know, social, all these other, you know, platform shifts that you want to talk about. They're all... It's all so much faster because like, what does it take to, you know, create billions of computers getting into people's hands and generate demand for those computers a long time, right? The internet as well, like the telco and stuff. Now it's like... everybody knows what's happening all the time and everybody wants it immediately like yesterday you got it this is why you know you can go out and look and you'll find us on some of these lists but why they're setting this new standard of like getting to 100 million in revenue like in your second year in business because all of this distribution now exists you know you come out with this great app you know the insane growth of chat gpt just in itself and open ai it's like if you didn't have everybody with a phone and everybody with a computer and everybody connected with high bandwidth and all these other things none of that would be possible but now in the age of artificial intelligence all this is possible well where i'm going with the innovators dilemma is even if i was just my old company and it's like i'm sitting here with a thousand employees and some really nice revenue and all my legacy processes and people and software and everything else and i see this platform shift come and i go the right thing to do is to destroy everything and start over it's to rebuild absolutely everything to take advantage of ai and that is the true innovators to limits you see the innovation and you go but wait i got all this stuff. I got this business. I can't just retrain all my people. I can't just tear down everything. I can't pause everything with my current customers and go build this. So I've either got to build it completely in parallel while I'm still providing my services, which sometimes happens. You see some of these legacy companies will go invest in that and do that and build this and stand this up. But even then, it's hard to give it the attention of your core business. Absolutely. So what ends up happening is these legacy guys try to bolt this on and the people like us come along and go, no. We're doing this from first principles. We're doing it from a clean sheet of paper. We're doing it as a small, nimble company. One of my great analyses here, we've hired a huge amount of hyperscaler software engineers. It's one of our big differentiators over the rest of our competitors in the managed security services industry. I've invested in these world-class software engineers that none of my competitors have. And a big part of why I got them is because they literally ship more code. to production here in a quarter, then most of them shipped their entire careers working for a hyperscaler. A lot of software engineers, they want to actually do something. They want to see their code get to production, get in a customer's hands and actually produce meaningful results. You know, man, the search for meaning. Like we don't want to just move a bit from here to there and, you know, go home at the end of the day and go, oh man, I completed 10,000 lines of code and checked it in. And a year from now, maybe that'll make it to production. It's like. oh man, I worked really hard today and I built this thing that this customer needed and it got in and they thanked me and they actually caught a bad guy real time because of this thing that I built. That is incredibly gratifying. So we're able to move at this insane pace in part by being AI native, in part by being a smaller laser focused company on this mission. And I honestly couldn't be more grateful. And that's part of why all this stuff is coming together the way that it is, why we're on these crazy hyper growth lists. in part because of AI just in general, in part because of that insane distribution that exists of everyone that's come before us, but in part because everybody else is stuck behind the innovators dilemma and our customers can see it in like five minutes. We have tens of thousands of people who have followed the show. Are you one of those people? You want to be part of the group. You want to be a part of those tens of thousands of followers. So hit the follow button. It's funny. I was just thinking about it this morning on the innovators 11. I was thinking about it. If you're a founder CEO of an existing business, your main thought right now is how do I use AI to elevate my product? How do I bring AI into my product? Which starts at the wrong place because you're starting with, given the fact that I have this legacy SaaS product, how do I improve it through AI? The new founders are just thinking first principles, given that AI exists, how do I solve a customer's problem? And it's just a totally different way of looking at it. In some cases, some unique cases, adding AI to your product might just be the thing. But in many, many cases, you'll end up in totally different situations. And then you'll wonder why these new AI native businesses are kind of eating your lunch. And it's because they don't have any of that legacy. They can just say, oh, all of a sudden, you can deliver 10x value by doing this thing. It has nothing to do with your existing product. You've got it exactly. That is the fundamental difference to me of built on versus bolted on. Built in, native. from that first principle philosophy. And it starts everywhere to me. It's even your most entry-level employees being truly AI native. And to me, like we talk about the doomerism of job creation and everything else. It's like, man, we're hiring like crazy. Like we're growing incredible pace. We're hiring like crazy. And every other great company that I talk to is hiring like crazy. And they're hiring people who are AI native, who understand how to use these kinds of tools. and how to generate this insane productivity because if you had a business model before that said oh i'm going to hire one software developer and i'm going to pay them let's just say 150 grand a year because they're going to produce 500 000 of business value maybe you don't specifically lay this out but like if you were hiring a software developer before you should have had some level of that kind of math going on maybe you didn't know it or be able to explain it If I tell you that that same software developer is now producing $5 million of business value, do you hire less software developers or do you hire more? You go in and go, holy crap, I could hire two software developers and they produce 10 million and now I can hire five more software developers and they... This is what I mean. The whole pie is going to grow. The whole productivity is going to shift. And I think we're going to be in a true golden age of America in the next decade. I think an economic boom like has never been seen before in this country and hopefully in the entire world. So Eric, tell me about this first product. Like, are you building an AI first MSP or are you selling AI to MSPs to help them improve what they do? So great question. And we're not building, we built and are shipping and have, and this is why again, like we're going to close this first year, still a little bit of time left, but we'll probably land this first year, call it 43 million in revenue. Wow. first year from first dollar. So that doesn't even compute. I mean, I mean, we're going to talk about how that even actually works like from a day to day closing basis. But but yeah, okay. No, absolutely. So what we've built is an AI native cybersecurity service and what we're selling that and this is advice to you know, I know you've got a lot of entrepreneurs and founders that listen to this. The important part here is what we're selling is a value proposition. We're selling an outcome. I'm not selling a product. You know, there's this very famous story that if you aren't familiar, one of the greatest marketing minds ever talks about this concept of a quarter inch hole, a quarter inch drill bit. I won't do it the same level of justice that this great marketing mind will. You know, we can link it in the show notes, but the long story short is so many people go and sell quarter inch drill bits, right? I'm making this product and what it does is it's a quarter inch drill bit. What does it do? It puts a quarter inch hole in the wall. Nobody goes and buys a quarter inch drill bit. You don't go, oh man, I really want to own a quarter inch drill bit. Like that was my life, you know, goal was to have this drill bit. No, you go to the store and buy one because you need a quarter inch hole. But you don't actually need a quarter inch hole. What you need is to hang a shelf. And what you need, again, isn't to hang a shelf, right? I didn't grow up and go, oh man, one day I'm going to hang a shelf on my own. What you want, what you need is how you're going to feel. When you hang that shelf and you organize your bedroom and you put these books on it, what you're selling, if you make a quarter inch drill bit, is safety. You're selling security. You're selling how you feel or how you feel when your wife finally goes like, you finally put up that shelf that I was asking for for six months. Like that feeling is what you're selling. And that is ultimately what we're selling. We're selling outcomes to our customers, which is we're going to fight evil on your behalf. We're going to make you more secure. we're going to provide for you cybersecurity outcomes. We're going to help you from getting hacked. We're going to stop the bad guys. We're going to detect and respond to your threats. And we're going to do it better and faster and more cost-effective than you ever thought possible. Certainly better and more cost-effective than if you had to go hire a team to do this yourself. And I can prove that to you in about 30 seconds with the math of why this is much more efficient and effective. I would love that because that's basically what it sounds like is you're selling to end customers. Customers who right now either have their own in-house team or have an in-house team, perhaps an MSP or just an MSP. And you're probably going in and saying, get rid of the MSP put us instead, I would assume. But I'm curious what the pitch goes like. Yeah. And that's one of the great parts of this too, man. I've got to tell you, after having built a few different businesses, one of the great businesses that I had very much a pleasure being a part of and helping to build, we grew this company called Risk IQ that we ultimately sold to Microsoft. Fantastic business, fantastic team, one of the greatest experiences of my life, but we were really early. And sometimes it's way worse to be early than it is to be late and bringing a product to market. One of the big lessons I learned from RiskIQ was if you can, if you can build a business where you're selling something that the customer already understands, that's already in their budget, that's already solving an existing pain point, and this is what we're doing at 10X, to your point, I'm going in and saying, look, you're doing this one of two ways today. You've either got an in-house team, and by the way, if you have an in-house team and you're doing what we call true 24-7 security, where you've got, which guess what? The bad guys don't sleep at the same hours you do. You're getting attacked literally 24 hours a day that you're on the internet, which means if you're serious at all about cybersecurity, you've got to be doing this 24 hours a day. It's not, oh, we're just going to hire some people and work eight to five, and the bad guys want to attack us on the weekends or nights or holidays. Of course they do. just to start with a 24-7 team if you want those people to be able to have any sort of quality of life you've got to hire 15 employees just to make a 24-7 team just to do the eight or ten hour shifts to have around the clock coverage so if you're a smaller mid-sized business talking about cyber security that's an immediate non-starter right you can't go hire 15 people just to watch this clock just to to respond to this which frankly is the birth of msps it's like that's the reason why that became so big that is the fundamental concept right and so If I can come in and do that for them in a way that is better and more cost-effective than their current provider, which I can show them in, you know, literally a 30-second demo of how our AI natively embedded into all of our people, these concepts of co-pilots and the AI doing so much work to supplement the human, it just... immediately blows everybody's mind. They get it in an instant. It's like, okay, I get it. I see it. But the other side of this that you alluded to earlier, the big difference for us is we're real. And it's so funny. I had one of the, literally one of the greatest CISOs in the world give me this really great compliment. I'm not going to use his name. I'm sure he's listening to know who he is, but you know, he said, we went into them and this is a top five financial services firm that we got as a customer. We went from first contact to them to contracting in less than 60 days. from the first time we met with them to a signed contract in less than 60 days, which anybody who knows the enterprise procurement space... It should be a year, year and a half, yeah. Yeah, this is why the age of AI, you can come in with a demonstrable product that is provably, immediately, observably better, and people go, I obviously get it. I want this right now. Let's speed this through. So the big compliment that he gave me, he's like, look, man, I sat down with all of the big guys. All of the biggest vendors, everybody you'd want, you know, these billion, trillion dollar market cap companies, and they're coming in and they're saying the same thing you are. They're talking about how AI is going to change everything and agentic AI and this and this. And I go, that's great, show me. And they all go, well, we're building this and like seven months from now, we're going to have this release and we can do this and this. How we sold them, my CTO and I walk in, we brought up two laptops. One laptop was our product. The other laptop was our console. and we were showing all the API calls, all the AI queries, all the AI responses that were happening on the backend. And it was, this isn't demo-ware, this isn't fake. All of this is real, all of this is built, and all of it works today. And we sat down and show him that. You just immediately see the light bulbs go off and the fireworks going off of like, oh my God, this is going to change everything. What does a killer 30-second demo look like for cybersecurity for 10X? Cybersecurity, real easy example, right? What we're doing, what we're talking about is detecting and responding to threats. And the way that this works, you might get a bunch of different alerts. My firewall, my endpoint. So like CrowdStrike says, I've got this problem on this machine. And the way that this normally happens, somebody gets that alert, you know, an analyst working in your company or working for a managed security company, they get an alert, they get to it, they pull it up. They read it. They try to understand what it means. They then go, is there anything else that's going on in my company that looks like this, that might be relevant to this? I need to go try to pull all this together. I need to go run a bunch of searches and queries to try to figure out what's going on. It's a process that everybody in cybersecurity understands. It might take you 15 minutes in a very nice, everything went perfect. Maybe that was 15 minutes. More often, it's like an hour. two hours of work that I'm doing where I'm running all these queries waiting on the data to come back everything else I come and pull up that same alert except the AI and we've got you know seven or eight different clusters of agents that are constantly working on our behalf the AI has already clustered 30 different alerts that are all the same thing that you all want to look at it's already produced a very meaningful summary of exactly what's going on it's already told me here's exactly what's happening. It's already assigned the right playbook. It's already pulled all of the data sources underneath the table together into one place for me. It's literally when you pull it up, the AI in one second has done an hour's worth of human work. And it's still human in the loop. So you're still selling the full service to them. It's not like you're depending on the AI because you're still there behind it all. Exactly. That quite honestly, like I'll give away one of our big secrets for this, but you know, I've talked about this a little bit publicly. This is where I think the AI SOX space, the space that we operate in has gotten pretty crowded. You know, I think we're pretty widely seen as one of the leaders in this, if not the leading company in the space. I had one venture capitalist tell me we have more customers of revenue than all of the others put together, which I think was just them being nice. But regardless, the reason for it is they're selling a product and we're selling an outcome. And the other big secret of that is that their customers don't want to buy a black box AI and turn everything over to it, especially from a security perspective. You think, again, back to that analogy of self-driving cars. Elon didn't come out and go, hey, we've solved self-driving. You're just going to hop in and it's going to take you wherever you want to go. And in fact, you're not even going to tell it where you want it to go. It's just going to know where you want to go and it's going to drive you there. What they did is said, you're still going to be at the controls and we're going to get you from point A to point B and this is going to be provably safer and provably better than just a pure human driver. But we're learning along the way and we're showing you and everybody had that understanding and they could interact with it and go. Our corporate buyers are the same way. They can't risk a sign turning over their cybersecurity program to a black box AI product. What they can risk a sign is working with a services company and working with that services company. who happens to be using a huge amount of artificial intelligence. So long story short, I think most of the other AI SOC software companies are going to end up either trying to become services companies, which they're going to fail miserably at because they've never actually built or run services companies. And guess what? It's way harder than you think. Or they're going to end up trying to sell products to services companies like you alluded to before, which is a terrible business to be in. I can tell you as having formally built one of the bigger service providers, we're terrible customers and you don't want to be doing that. Eric, this thing you're talking about, I just want to go a little tangent on it. I think it's such a misunderstood piece because you think about B2B SaaS as the thing that was happening for the last decade in terms of founders and how they're thinking. It's all about 80%, 90% margin. It's all about no capex, get the goods out, capital light. These are just the things that were proven to be the things that work, the things that you want. That's why everybody owes no hotels, blah, blah, blah. It all comes from there. Everybody wants that. With AI, the reality is for a variety of reasons. Part is a customer doesn't want to give a black box AI kind of full control. It's too scary. Part is they're not really there yet. Like they hallucinate. Part is if you think about a job to be done, AI maybe can do 60% or 80%, but almost never 100%. Because of all of those reasons, if you want to deliver outcomes, you're really stuck either going to a company and saying, buy my AI. Okay, I have like 100% margin, 90% margins. But you've got to figure out how many employees you can really fire or like how to get your employees to use it and like somehow leverage up. Or, and I think this is the way that you get insane adoption. You take it on, which is what you're doing. And you say, I'm so confident in my AI being able to do 80%. I'll give you 100%. You don't really care what percent is humans. Like I'll figure that out over time. I'll squeeze that, right? So I have the best margins possible. But from your perspective, you're getting the full value delivered. You don't really need to think about where it comes from. sure i won't have the exact same margin profile as if i was pure product but i'm delivering an entire job to be done and when you can do that the pull you should get from the market is so much higher because you're actually solving a problem instead of like half of a problem totally agree and in fact this is where i think the dirty little secret a lot of people don't understand is most of the greatest sas companies were doing this historically too they were selling outcomes and they were delivering those outcomes in a lot of cases with, you know, a huge customer success or pro-serve portion, and they were giving the customer what they actually wanted. I used this analogy a ton. It's especially true in the SaaS business. Like, take, I don't know, Salesforce, maybe one of the most successful SaaS companies of all time by most objective measures. Nobody grows up and goes, I really want to buy a Salesforce today. Like, that is not why somebody is in business. They're buying an outcome, which is, I want my salespeople to be more productive. And when you buy Salesforce, you get consulting. built into it, you know, and especially at the bigger dollars where they're coming in and they're making you successful. And so most of the greatest SaaS companies learned that it's not just, oh yeah, give me your credit card and here's your credentials and there's your portal and go. They're selling outcomes and they were delivering those outcomes to the customer. That was the whole point of SaaS in the first place, software as a service. And a lot of people forgot the as a service part where they were like, well, no, it's just software delivered on the internet. No, that's not actual SaaS. The whole point was, it was supposed to have this concept built in of delivering the actual outcome that you don't have to do as much of the work as you had to do with on-prem software and it became instead i think just yeah it's the exact same thing as if you installed this on a computer in your environment here you go go use it it's like no the best sas delivered those kind of outcomes to you i think that's true i think it's often missed like for you know and i'm trying to think of a robot dick an analyst that's a large hedge fund as an example let's just say grunt work right you think about grunt work and some somebody who's doing something that you think ai can do the most of right but what most founders are doing i find is they're going to this hedge fund they're saying here's my ai it'll do 80 of what your analysts do so like now your analyst can use it and maybe you can fire eight out of every ten that you have and that's not received nearly as fast as if you were to go and say what does an analyst produce produces this type of research Why don't you just outsource it to us? We will produce the same research here. Go, look at the research we're producing. Look at how fast, ask me a question. Oh, look, boom. And you've got human in the loop, right? And now you're delivering the full outcome. It's just like, okay, wait, what about, you've actually solved my problem versus you almost introduced a bit of a new problem. Cause now I've got to figure out how to like upgrade my analyst and get him to use this stuff and all, everything that involved. Exactly. Yeah. Sell an outcome, deliver an outcome, deliver real value. Amazingly, everything else takes care of itself. Like if you produce an actual quality product that delivers actual quality outcomes, that is the most important thing in the list of most important things. So walk me through this question, because this is something finally my mind just like can't understand. You go from zero to $40 million run rate in a year. How do you do that mechanically? Like are you only signing $5 million contracts? How are you onboarding this fast? Like there's a logistical piece to even if you have the demand actually fulfilling it. Let me walk me through like. What does last quarter look like to you and how you make that happen? Yeah, for sure. There's components to all of that. So one, every part of my company is AI native. Finance, contracting, legal, onboarding, customer success, engineering, everything else. You know, we've done a huge amount of work and we envisioned this very early on. You know, we built the whole company from day one to IPO. We've been running real adult supervision and gap financials and all of these other things because. We believed if we were successful at solving our mission, a big part of it is the market is demanding a provider of this level of substance. You know, the market isn't looking for another, oh, cool, you built another $100 million MSSP. You know, now instead of 2,000 of them, there's 2,001. We believe the market is looking for the next great company in cybersecurity services. and is going to reward us correspondingly because we produced a better product and a better outcome that we knew this was the inevitable outcome. And so the long story short, we invested a ton in this from day one to go like, we need to be able to take orders and get customers onboarded the same day that they signed. Like we need to be able to deliver them value, real meaningful value the same day they signed the contract. so that you can not only recognize that revenue, but so you can deliver that value back to the customers so that you can turn them into a raving fan that's then willing to tell 10 of their friends or do 10 reference calls because you're giving them so much immediate value. And a lot of that does really come from this AI native advantage because the product is so much faster because every part of the stack is... operating more efficiently and more effectively. You know, we're not a 10x at every part of our business. Our, you know, contracting arm isn't doing 10 times the contract of a normal person, but they're doing more than what a pure manual person could do before. So that is part of it. The other part, for sure, I'm a big believer in this. sell to bigger companies at bigger dollar values, and then go down market. Like the vast majority of our first customers were all global 2000. You know, our first 10 customers, half of them were publicly traded Fortune 500 companies. What kind of ACVs? So if you looked at our total ACV, you can do an analysis of everybody, but I think it's actually more meaningful to look at kind of two clusters. So there's these global 2000 companies that are spending something like 500K ARR with us. And, you know, a lot of times they're doing even larger deals. But if you looked at the average across the global 2000, they're probably a 500K-ish, 490K ASP, ARR ASP, which is important, right? We're talking real ARR, not just this made up concept that some people will track these days of like, well, I did a thousand dollars yesterday. That means I'm at 30,000 MRR, right? You know, it doesn't work like that. Then the other cohort. We do believe our solution and we've proven it out that it's equally applicable to companies of all sizes. And that's part of the big advantage is we can take these solutions that are in use by some of the biggest banks, by some of the biggest technology companies and truly democratize it and bring that same level of value to a much smaller company. So we've also got a cohort of ASP that's sitting right around 100K. And that's why I think... as opposed to blending those two and going, oh, well, it's actually in the like threes. It's like, no, there's one big cluster sitting right around 500K and there's one big cluster sitting right around 100K and it's a double bell curve. What's the strategy there, by the way? Because some would say, well, just if you got the half a million, just do that until you're really capered out and then go down markets or anything. Yeah, and you can. And I believe that's a valid strategy if you're not. trying to be one of the fastest growing companies in history, which I mean, I don't know that we're explicitly trying for that, but what we are trying to do, quite frankly, is capture as much market share as we can, as fast as we can. I'm a firm believer that honestly, I believe every company should do that. Like, you know, the whole point of a startup is ultimately to find product market fit, right? And once you find that product market fit, you should throw as much fuel on the fire as you can and build as big, as great a company as you can, because even back to our earlier analogy if you're producing an input of a dollar is producing a business value output of five dollars you should just keep doing that until you have as much business value or until it starts to decrease so part of it is that part of it is the mission quite honestly the biggest banks have led cyber security for the last 30 years it's why i started my career in cyber security at a bank because in the early days they were the only ones that were doing cyber security My mission isn't just to bring better cybersecurity to the 200 biggest banks. It's to take the solutions that we have put in place in some of the biggest banks because they see the immediate ROI and the value, but to take that same technology that we've built for them and those same outcomes that we're delivering to them and go to this 150-person credit union that... we can provide them that same quality of service and the same quality of outcomes for a fraction of the price. That was going to be my answer. My question, sorry, is it 10x cheaper? Is that part of your selling proposition? It's cheaper. I'm not yet driving it down an order of magnitude. We might be able to over time, you know. But it's material enough that it becomes a bit of a no-brainer once you see that it's as good. Exactly. And I mean, especially if you can go in and see the product quality is higher. Like it's provably better, it's provably faster, and it's less expensive. I don't have to be 10x less expensive if it's like, well, you were going to buy this anyways. And even if I'm 15% or 20% more cost effective, that's still a massive win for everybody, right? The better comes in the form of what in this case? Like you show that you can detect worse threats, that there's less leakage. Like what's the... What's the better from a customer perspective? Yeah, it's all of the above. And I mean, there's all sorts of we're big fans of metrics and we're big fans of transparency. So we put a big dashboard in front of all of our customers that exposes a lot of these metrics that a lot of your traditional service providers hide or hide behind. And it's like, I'm going to show you all of this. We're a glass box philosophy in everything we do. All the AI underneath is all completely exposed. All the reasoning is exposed, everything else. We believe greatly in that transparency. But I mean, here's a dirty secret of the MSSP industry, but it's also of every security company. And I, you know, just had this conversation yesterday with one of the biggest financial services. companies, and they even say the same thing as they're now looking at buying a product, is you guys aren't looking at all your alerts today, right? And they're like, no, of course not. Nobody could. Guess what? I am. And I can. And I can prove to you that I'm doing it. And I can prove to you that I'm doing it in a way that is provably, scientifically using like literal quality assurance language. And that's the other interesting thing, like QA and quality assurance is a solved problem. And it has been for a long time. I'll talk more about that later. But like, I can show you provable statistics about why our quality is better. And we're doing it at machine scale across every single alert in your entire environment. That produces a 10x alone. Because even the biggest, most well-funded companies were going that, you know, and they would tout themselves, and I think correctly so, is like, we've got one of the best security programs on the planet, and we're not able to look at everything today. But AI can. And AI can do it better than what a human could do, especially if the bar was... Well, nobody's looking at it. Like, you know, this is the self-driving car analogy to me, too. And you touched on this with, you know, non-deterministic or hallucination, right? Guess what? All this stuff's being done by humans today. It's just like driving. Tesla is never going to be perfect with self-driving cars. It never will be. The question is, is it an order of magnitude better than the mistakes that are being made today by human drivers? From a cybersecurity perspective, I've had the opportunity, the fortune or good fortune, maybe bad fortune, to have worked some of the biggest breaches in history. Like if you go look at the list, you'll find I got some of the good or bad fortune to be part of the team that we're working on some of those. But, you know, from being around this industry for a long time, not just the ones I worked, but all of them, if you go look at all the breaches, they all have one thing in common. It's human error. It's not, oh man, the technical controls failed and, you know, man, they went in and, you know, they... cracked the encryption on our mainframe with this massive level of technological prowess. It's like they sent a phishing link and somebody clicked on it and gave them their credentials and that's how they got in. Or this person left this thing exposed and had this problem. Like that's how bad happens in our world. It's the same thing with self-driving. Accidents happen because somebody is distracted or they're not paying attention and they, you know, were drinking, they made a mistake, they just were inexperienced. AI doesn't have to be perfect. It just has to be better than the humans. And when I especially take that route of like, if you're throwing away millions of alerts a day, because you don't have the human manpower to look at them. If I can look at them with an AI that's just 80% as good as a human, that's way better than what you were doing today. Tell me a little bit about go to market. Like, you know, go to market tactics, I think are one of the things that are like top of mind for many early stage founders. I don't know if rightly so more and more, it's like, if you have insane product market fit, like a lot of things get taken care of. But In any case, how do you go to market? Like how much is inbound? How much is outbound? What strategies, tactics are you using that you found are particularly useful this last year? Yeah, I think a couple points. So one, you know, this is one of those other unfair advantages we had in starting a company is because I've done this before, I've got a 30-year career of people who trust me. I've got fellow CISOs, other companies, companies that I've sold to literally one of my first customers. here at 10x has been my customer four times. They've bought four different products from me at four different companies. You earn that level of trust and it's way easier to sell to those kind of people who already trust you, who've already got a great relationship with you. So the other big secret, I think, you know, it's maybe two. One, I'm a huge proponent of founder-led sales. And I think way too many people start a company and they don't do founder-led sales. You know, especially we see these days where like a solopreneur or somebody else like is the tech genius that starts the company and they can't sell and i will always tell people great if you're the tech genius and can start a company and you're the ceo but you're really the founding engineer and all of that great go find a co-founder who can sell you have to have both roles in the founding team of your company you have to have somebody who can sell and you have to have somebody who can build In my case, I'm fortunate enough that I have both sets of skills and I can build and sell. And at the same time, I've built an amazing team around me of people who can sell and people who can build and everything else. I'm very fortunate in all of that. But that is one of the big keys, especially going zero to one and going one to 10. All of those early adopters, they're buying the founders as much as they are the product. They're buying your vision. They're buying your ability to execute. They're buying what you're selling into the world that you're going to create. And way too much of the time, I'll see this of a technically amazing, brilliant founder who can't sell. They can't go communicate to the customer and they can't drive this. And so I think that's one of the other keys. And then the other thing I'd say is the channel. The right channel and the right channel partnerships. This is something that a lot of people waste a lot of time on and they don't do right and they don't get the right traction from. But if you do it right, if you have the right true channel partners. they can drive a huge amount of value for us. So directly answering your question, we're probably a third of our business is like direct outbound sales. About a third of our business comes through the channel where we've got other partners bringing us and then about a third, and it's actually probably more like 20%. So if you looked at it, it's probably more like 40, 40, 20 that's coming from what we would consider inbound or marketing driven as opposed to like direct enterprise sales outreach. The piece you're saying about being somebody from the space has been one of our big theses when it comes to at least the verticalized AI, just because, I mean, this has always been the case, obviously, team is critical and having industry expertise has always been important. But I think with AI more than ever, you know, this idea of like product moats, I mean, it's really hard to say that you're like years ahead just because, you know, the talent is one thing. But at the end of the day, you know, people are building things really, really fast and copycats will appear. But if you can go to market that much faster and understand your customer that much more and therefore have faster speed cycles in terms of the things that you put out and being on bullseye when you decide this is the next thing we should build, that really becomes, I think, the edge. And, you know, frankly, it's harder to displace and rip away one customer than it is to go to somebody, you know, Greenfield that hasn't adopted anyone yet. So whoever lands the customers first, then everybody else is playing catch up. And I think that's one of the biggest edges today. Oh, man, I completely agree. I mean, I believe so much, not only in my own, but like when I go and invest, it's in that founder conviction. who like sees the world of like I started this of I'm solving my own problem I'm building the product I always wanted to buy or the service I always wanted to consume or it's the yeah I've been in this industry for 5, 10, 30 years in my case I know what the problems are and I'm solving them the worst thing to me that I see is the people who go oh well I saw that these kind of things got funded last quarter and so I decided I'm going to go build that and it's like you don't have any conviction and you're operating out of your rear view mirror like where is your vision of the future what is the reality that you're going to manifest and bring into the world that's the journey that people want to go on they want that authenticity especially those early adopters they want to see that you have that vision that you're going to be able to execute on and you're going to bring something into the world that didn't exist before Svarik, let me stop it there and I'll ask the last three questions that we always end on. The first one is, when did you feel like you had true product market fit? Oh man. You know, I think when we closed our first deal, quite honestly, was immediate validation because it was a top financial institution, a publicly traded, one of the biggest companies. When they were like, oh yes, this is obvious, this is exactly what we need and exactly what we've been looking for. That was immediate product market fit proof point to me. Now, your first customer isn't always going to do that. And I would maybe discourage people from going, oh, we closed one customer. But when it's like your ideal, ideal, most ideal, most perfect customer for your exact use case. what is traditionally like a year sales cycle, when you see that immediate fit where they're like, oh no, we're going to throw out all these procurement rules. We got to get this through right now because this is exactly what we need. Like we knew from that moment forward, we had the right product. But quite honestly, the only reason we did that is because we've been doing this so long because we built this exact product before, or not exact, but you know, we built products in this exact space before is what I mean. And you know, because we had that experience. we knew the moment we got traction that we had true product market fit. And then on the flip side, has there ever been a time in the last year where you thought things would just completely break, maybe just not work out? Man, anybody who tells you otherwise is lying to you. This startup life is you go and there is nothing in between. It is either, oh my God, this is amazing, everything is going so incredibly well, we're all going to be trillionaires, to, oh my God, we're all going to die and everything is on fire. and there is absolutely nothing in between. You know, when you're early, especially, you look at like your first 10 customers. Doug Leone gave me this great quote early on. I had the opportunity to sit with him and he's like, you know, you need to sell your soul for your first 10 customers. And I maybe want to hang on to my soul, but like the general concept of that, right, I get behind of the like, you have to do whatever it takes is what he means to acquire and retain and deliver. a true 10 ICP customers. And when you're in that, guess what? You lose one of 10 deals. That's like 10% of your company. It might even be 20, 30% of your company. So those early, the early stage, there's just nothing but those high and low swings. And yeah, I mean, we're incredibly fortunate. You know, we've got great partners with, you know, when Andreessen Horowitz backs you, you get an unfair playing advantage. You know, they unlock so much value. And then, you know, we had a really great team with Crosspoint come in and back us who, that's another great example here, right? The CEO of Crosspoint used to be the CEO of Symantec. That was basically the biggest cybersecurity services company for quite a while. So like you want to talk about somebody who's been there, done that and brings that expertise, man, when you can have a true strategic venture capital partner who's literally considered one of the great CEOs in cybersecurity history. Like, man, that is a ridiculous advantage. So long winded answer, but like you do a lot of stuff to mitigate the lows. You hire the right team, you work with the right partners, you do all this. But even at our level, even on that list of like fastest growing cybersecurity companies in history, there is still moments of abject terror. We're all going to die. I think it was Reid Hoffman who said, you know, the whole thing of a startup. is you're throwing yourself off a cliff with a box of airplane parts and you're putting the airplane on the way together as you're throwing yourself off the cliff. But the part that he underestimated when he says that is the parts are all on fire and you are on fire and you're taking fire. Like that is what a startup is like. Last question. What would be like your number one piece of advice for an early stage founder building an AI today? Oh man. Honestly, there's a lot been written about a lot of product market approaches and sales and marketing and everything else. I'll give one like really tactical example that a lot of people are sleeping on, which is Google. If you're not building on Gemini or if you haven't at least run analysis on Gemini versus the other AIs you're using, you are missing the boat. Gemini is the most cost-effective AI out there today, certainly from the biggest players. They're incredibly valuable. And I firmly believe Google is going to come out as the singular biggest winner in the AI landscape. Alphabet specifically, I guess I should say not just Google, but like that is a company that I have tremendous respect for that has a tremendous ability to execute. And I think surprisingly, I talked to a lot of people who are like, yeah, you know, we're building an AI and we're doing this. And I'm like, well, what models are you using? Have you looked at all of them? Have you looked at several of them? And they just know they got locked into open AI or they got locked into I'm not saying don't use all of them. They're all fantastic. And in fact, we use all of them inside of 10X for different use cases. I personally use Grok a ton and I'm a huge fan of what Grok Heavy does for me in some tasks that nothing else comes close. But Gemini, that's my one little takeaway. If you're building an AI, you should really take a strong look at Google and at least run some cost benefit analysis. Eric, thanks so much for jumping on the show, man. I'm excited to keep seeing you on some of the most insane growth lists. Thank you so much, man. Really a big fan of the show and thanks so much for having me. And I will just leave it with anybody who wants to reach out, you can find me on the socials. X, Twitter is probably the single best place to get me on Performify. Basically perform plus the IFY of like modify, Performify on Twitter. or I've got a link tree that's at the same that you can go find all my socials and everything else. I'll drop it in the show notes for you. Wow, what an episode. You're probably in awe. You're in absolute shock. You're like, that helped me so much. So guess what? Now it's your turn to help someone else. Share the episode in the WhatsApp group you have with founders. Share it on that Slack channel. Send it to your founder friends and help them out. Trust me, they will love you for it.

⚙️ Pipeline jobs

StageStatusAtt.UpdatedError
download done 1/3 2026-05-28 08:47:36
transcribe done 1/3 2026-05-28 08:56:18
summarize done 1/3 2026-05-28 08:56:35
embed done 1/3 2026-06-30 06:43:49

📄 Описание YouTube

Показать
Eric spent 30 years in cybersecurity. Built and sold an MSSP to private equity for hundreds of millions. Then he started Tenex and hit $43 million in revenue in ONE YEAR. 


This isn't theory. This is a founder who's done it multiple times breaking down exactly how AI-native companies are about to eat every services industry alive. If you're building anything that touches AI, services, or enterprise sales, this is the episode.


Why You Should Listen

  •  Why selling outcomes beats selling products every time
  •  How to close enterprise deals in 60 days instead of 12 months
  •  The difference between AI-native and AI-bolted-on companies
  •  Why founder-led sales is non-negotiable in the early days
  •  How to build for IPO from day one without slowing down

Keywords


startup podcast, startup podcast for founders, AI startup growth, founder-led sales, zero to one startup, enterprise sales strategy, AI native company, managed services startup, cybersecurity startup, product market fit

00:00:00 Intro


00:10:29 Selling His Last Company for $100Ms


00:15:10 The Origin Story of TENEX


00:36:47 How They Hit $43M ARR in Year One


00:43:27 The 30 Second Demo That Closes Enterprise Deals


00:47:10 Why Selling Outcomes Beats Selling Products


00:51:29 The Mechanics of Going From Zero to $40M ARR


01:01:09 Go to Market and Founder Led Sales


01:05:32 When He Knew He Had Product Market Fit


















Retry


Send me a message to let me know what you think! (https://www.buzzsprout.com/twilio/text_messages/1889238/open_sms)